ReviewArchives of disease in childhood2007
Evidence for sexual transmission of genital herpes in children.
Review in Archives of disease in childhood, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.
- Differential diagnosis of perianal herpes: sexual abuse or autoinoculation?Forensic science, medicine, and pathology · 2026Article
- Sexual Violence against Adolescents in the State of Espírito Santo, Brazil: An Analysis of Reported Cases.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Physical symptoms in very young children assessed for sexual abuse: a mixed method analysis from the ASAC study.European journal of pediatrics · 2017Article
- Medical and legal implications of testing for sexually transmitted infections in children.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionGenital herpes in a prepubertal child presents a child protection clinician with a difficult problem: how likely is it that transmission occurred as a consequence of sexual abuse? Published guidelines on the management of sexually transmitted infections in children provide varying recommendations and refer to a limited literature.
objectiveTo review the evidence for the likelihood of sexual transmission in a child with proven genital herpes.
methodsStructured literature search for reports of series of children presenting with genital herpes where an assessment for possible sexual transmission or child sexual abuse had been made.
resultsFive suitable papers were identified. Although just over half of reported cases of genital herpes in children had evidence suggestive of a sexual mode of transmission, the quality of assessment of possible sexual abuse was too weak to enable any reliable estimation of its likelihood. Sexual transmission is reported more commonly in older children (aged > or =5 years), in children presenting with genital lesions alone and where type 2 herpes simplex virus is isolated.
conclusionsChild protection clinicians should be aware of the weakness of the evidence on the likelihood of sexual transmission of genital herpes in prepubertal children. The US guidance that child sexual abuse is "suspicious" reflects the evidence better than the UK guidance that it is "probable". A larger, more up-to-date, methodologically sound, population based study is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.