Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17148276›Full record

SynthesisBiology letters2006

Paternity loss in contrasting mammalian societies.

T H Clutton-Brock, K Isvaran

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Biology letters, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Sex roles and adult sex ratios: insights from mammalian biology and consequences for primate behaviour.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  14. Reproductive competition and sexual selection.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Variation in grouping patterns, mating systems and social structure: what socio-ecological models attempt to explain.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Review
  18. Cooperative breeding and monogamy in mammalian societies.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2012
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

T H Clutton-BrockDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. thcb@hermes.cam.ac.uk
K Isvaran

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent genetic analyses show that, in social mammals, loss of paternity by breeding males varies with strategies of mate guarding rather than with the degree of polygyny.

Indexed as

PaternityAnimalsFemaleMaleMammalsModels, StatisticalPair BondSexual Behavior, Animal

Identifiers

PMID17148276
PMCPMC1833980

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.