Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17146588›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of colorectal disease2007

Spontaneous regression of colorectal cancer: a review of cases from 1900 to 2005.

Ayman S Abdelrazeq

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of colorectal disease, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. What Can Trigger Spontaneous Regression of Breast Cancer?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Spontaneous regression of colorectal liver metastasis.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Exceptional patients and communication in cancer care-are we missing another survival factor?Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  20. Fever: Views in Anthroposophic Medicine and Their Scientific Validity.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ayman S AbdelrazeqColorectal Unit, Department of Surgery, Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, UK. aymonrazeq@yahoo.co.uk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSpontaneous regression of cancer is an exceptional but well-documented biological event. Further understanding of this phenomenon and harnessing of the mechanisms involved will have significant preventative and therapeutic implications. DISCUSSION: In this review, the literature of spontaneous regression of colon or rectal cancer is reviewed from 1965 to 2005 to update reviews by Everson et al., Boyd and Challis et al. By adding to these, the author reports the entire series of colorectal cancer, which underwent documented spontaneous regression from 1900 to 2005. The demographic and pathologic characteristics, the details of regression and the outcome of reported cases are presented and discussed. Special emphasis is placed on identifying possible causes hypothesized by authors for occurrence of regression. Possible mechanisms operating to affect these regressions are also discussed.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRemission, SpontaneousRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.