Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17145914›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical ethics2006

Non-reporting and inconsistent reporting of race and ethnicity in articles that claim associations among genotype, outcome, and race or ethnicity.

H Shanawani, L Dame, D A Schwartz, R Cook-Deegan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical ethics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Racial and Ethnic Representation Reporting in Orthopaedic Research.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Diversity of Enrollment in Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials: Current Status and Future Directions.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A critical review of racial/ethnic variables in osteoporosis and bone density research.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2011
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H ShanawaniDepartment of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Hospitals, 1 Ford Place, 5C-69 Detroit, MI 48202, USA. hshanawani@yahoo.com
L Dame
D A Schwartz
R Cook-Deegan

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe use of race as a category in medical research is the focus of an intense debate, complicated by the inconsistency of presumed independent variables, race and ethnicity, on which analysis depends. Interpretation is made difficult by inconsistent methods for determining the race or ethnicity of a participant. The failure to specify how race or ethnicity was determined is common in the published literature. HYPOTHESIS: Criteria by which they assign a research participant to racial or ethnic categories are not reported by published articles.

methodsMethods were reviewed for assigning race and ethnicity of research participants in 268 published reports reporting associations among race (or ethnicity), health outcome and genotype.

resultsOf the 268 published reports reviewed, it was found that 192 (72%) did not explain their methods for assigning race or ethnicity as an independent variable. This was despite the fact that 180 (67%) of those reports reached conclusions about associations among genetics, health outcome and race or ethnicity.

conclusionsMore attention needs to be given to the definition of race and ethnicity in genetic studies, especially in those diseases where health disparities are known to exist.

Indexed as

BiasEthics, ResearchEthnicityGenotypeRacial GroupsData CollectionHuman ExperimentationHumansPeriodicals as TopicPublishingResearch Design

Identifiers

PMID17145914
PMCPMC2563355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.