Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17145798›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2007

Moxifloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin, and ciprofloxacin against Mycobacterium tuberculosis: evaluation of in vitro and pharmacodynamic indices that best predict in vivo efficacy.

Radha K Shandil, Ramesh Jayaram, Parvinder Kaur, Sheshagiri Gaonkar, B L Suresh, B N Mahesh, R Jayashree, Vrinda Nandi, Sowmya Bharath, V Balasubramanian

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01298336 (Efficacy of Clarithromycin or Moxifloxacin Containing Regimen in 6 Months Sputum Conversion of Mycobacterium Xenopi), which is not on this map. Cited by 96 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01298336 phase3completednot on this mapstarted 2011, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Clarithromycin or Moxifloxacin Containing Regimen in 6 Months Sputum Conversion of Mycobacterium Xenopi

TypeinterventionalSponsorCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, AmiensRan2011 to 2019Enrolled92ConditionsAtypical, Mycobacterium, Pulmonary, TuberculousArmsClarithromycin, Moxifloxacin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pharmacokinetics and Optimal Dosing of Levofloxacin in Children for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: An Individual Patient Data Meta-Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Treatment outcomes among patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2010
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Elevated Plasma Moxifloxacin Concentrations andAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2018
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Radha K ShandilAstraZeneca India Pvt. Ltd., Hebbal, Bellary Road, Bangalore 560024, India.
Ramesh Jayaram
Parvinder Kaur
Sheshagiri Gaonkar
B L Suresh
B N Mahesh
R Jayashree
Vrinda Nandi
Sowmya Bharath
V Balasubramanian
AstraZeneca (India) · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Members of the fluoroquinolone class are being actively evaluated for inclusion in tuberculosis chemotherapy regimens, and we sought to determine the best in vitro and pharmacodynamic predictors of in vivo efficacy in mice. MICs for Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv were 0.1 mg/liter (sparfloxacin [SPX]) and 0.5 mg/liter (moxifloxacin [MXF], ciprofloxacin [CIP], and ofloxacin [OFX]). The unbound fraction in the presence of murine serum was concentration dependent for MXF, OFX, SPX, and CIP. In vitro time-kill studies revealed a time-dependent effect, with the CFU reduction on day 7 similar for all four drugs. However, with a J774A.1 murine macrophage tuberculosis infection model, CIP was ineffective at up to 32x MIC. In addition, MXF, OFX, and SPX exhibited less activity than had been seen in the in vitro time-kill study. After demonstrating that the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) and maximum concentration of drug in plasma were proportional to the dose in vivo, dose fractionation studies with total oral doses of 37.5 to 19,200 mg/kg of body weight (MXF), 225 to 115,200 mg/kg (OFX), 30 to 50,000 mg/kg (SPX), and 38 to 100,000 mg/kg (CIP) were performed with a murine aerosol infection model. MXF was the most efficacious agent (3.0+/-0.2 log10 CFU/lung reduction), followed by SPX (1.4+/-0.1) and OFX (1.5+/-0.1). CIP showed no effect. The ratio of the AUC to the MIC was the pharmacodynamic parameter that best described the in vivo efficacy. In summary, a lack of intracellular killing predicted the lack of in vivo activity of CIP. The in vivo rank order for maximal efficacy of the three active fluoroquinolones was not clearly predicted by the in vitro assays, however.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntitubercular AgentsAza CompoundsCiprofloxacinDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalFluoroquinolonesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMoxifloxacinMycobacterium tuberculosisOfloxacinPredictive Value of TestsQuinolinesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntitubercular AgentsAza CompoundsCiprofloxacinFluoroquinolonesMoxifloxacinOfloxacinQuinolinessparfloxacin

Identifiers

PMID17145798
PMCPMC1797767
OpenAlexW2137088409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.