Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17144183›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics2006

The limits of disclosure: what research subjects want to know about investigator financial interests.

Christine Grady, Elizabeth Horstmann, Jeffrey S Sussman, Sara Chandros Hull

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Patient views on financial relationships between surgeons and surgical device manufacturers.Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Psychiatry: from interest in conflicts to conflicts of interest.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christine GradySection on Human Subjects Research, Department ofClinical Bioethics, Clinical Center, NIH, USA.
Elizabeth Horstmann
Jeffrey S Sussman
Sara Chandros Hull

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CL999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Research participants' views about investigator financial interests were explored. Reactions ranged from concern to acceptance, indifference, and even encouragement. Although most wanted such information, some said it did not matter, was private, or was burdensome, and other factors were more important to research decisions. Very few said it would affect their research decisions, and many assumed that institutions managed potential conflicts of interest. Although disclosure of investigator financial interest information to research participants is often recommended, its usefulness is limited, especially when participation is desired because of illness.

Indexed as

Attitude to HealthDecision MakingResearch Support as TopicBiomedical ResearchConflict of InterestDisclosureEthics Committees, ResearchHumansInformed ConsentInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchResearch SubjectsTherapeutic Human ExperimentationTrustUnited States

Identifiers

PMID17144183
PMCPMC7456520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.