ArticleThe Journal of rheumatology2007
Primary and revision hip arthroplasty: 5-year outcomes and influence of age and comorbidity.
Article in The Journal of rheumatology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04928924 (Functional Biomechanical Analysis in Immediate Post-Operative Period Following Total Hip Arthroplasty - A Pilot Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Functional Biomechanical Analysis in Immediate Post-Operative Period Following Total Hip Arthroplasty - A Pilot Study
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Early postoperative mortality following joint arthroplasty: a systematic review.The Journal of rheumatology · 2011Pooled it
- A minimally invasive approach for total hip arthroplasty does not diminish early post-operative outcome in obese patients: a prospective, randomised trial.International orthopaedics · 2013Trial
- Early migration characteristics of a hydroxyapatite-coated femoral stem: an RSA study.International orthopaedics · 2011Trial
- No differences in outcomes between cemented and uncemented acetabular components after 12-14 years: results from a randomized controlled trial comparing Duraloc with Charnley cups.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2010Trial
- Revision Risk Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Cohort Study From the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry.ANZ journal of surgery · 2026Article
- Is There Agreement Between Clinical Outcomes as Perceived by the Surgeon and the Patient in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty?Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Are social determinants of health associated with an increased length of hospitalization after revision total hip and knee arthroplasty? A comparison study of social deprivation indices.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2024Article
- Evaluating the risk of return to the operating room across all elective orthopaedic procedures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantages associated with prolonged length of stay and non-home discharge following revision total hip and knee joint arthroplasty.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
- Outcomes of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients 60 Years and Younger.The Iowa orthopaedic journal · 2023Article
- Net Promoter Score: a prospective, single-centre observational study assessing if a single question determined treatment success after primary or revision hip arthroplasty.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2023Observational
- Is Retention of the Acetabular Component at Revision Surgery a Long-Term Solution?Arthroplasty today · 2023Article
- Can machine learning models predict failure of revision total hip arthroplasty?Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2023Article
- Aseptic Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Modular Femoral Stem and a Modified Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy-Treatment Assessment With the Forgotten Joint Score-12.Arthroplasty today · 2022Article
- Do changes in outcomes following primary and revision hip replacement differ and relate to markers of socioeconomic status? A 1-year population-based cohort study.Acta orthopaedica · 2022Article
- Monobloc press-fit cups with large-diameter bearings are safe in revision total hip arthroplasty.Orthopedic reviews · 2022Article
- Overstretching Expectations May Endanger the Success of the "Millennium Surgery".Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022Article
- A risk-stratified approach to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with aspirin or warfarin following total hip and knee arthroplasty: A cohort study.Thrombosis research · 2021Article
- Tranexamic acid lowers transfusion requirements and hospital length of stay following revision total hip or knee arthroplasty.Patient safety in surgery · 2021Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveRevision hip arthroplasty is associated with less favorable short and longterm results than primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). We compared quality of life and satisfaction 5 years after the 2 interventions, to determine the influence of patient characteristics on poorer outcomes after revision, and to analyze if their influence differed for primary and for revision arthroplasty.
methodsThis was a hospital-based prospective cohort study including patients who underwent primary (n = 435) or revision THA (n = 116). Quality of life was measured by Harris Hip Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 questionnaire. Satisfaction was evaluated with a visual analog scale.
resultsPatients undergoing a revision were older, more often obese, and had more medical and orthopedic comorbidities. Five years after surgery, 349 patients with primary THA and 85 with revisions were available for followup. Unadjusted quality of life and satisfaction were significantly lower after revision (Harris Hip Score 76.7 vs 88.1; WOMAC pain 66.4 vs 73.3; WOMAC function 61.6 vs 70.0; satisfaction 7.7 vs 8.9). Adjustment for patient characteristics revealed that this difference was partly explained by the greater morbidity and older age of patients undergoing revision. The influence of age, comorbidities, and preoperative function on 5-year outcomes did not substantially differ for the 2 intervention groups. However, obesity was associated with a stronger negative effect on revision surgery.
conclusionPatients and physicians should acknowledge additional risks and consequently lower results associated with revision THA. Better information and medical preparation before surgery may help to improve the success of revision surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17143967W1958651325What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.