Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17143584›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2006

Reciprocal chromosome painting between three laboratory rodent species.

Svetlana A Romanenko, Polina L Perelman, Natalya A Serdukova, Vladimir A Trifonov, Larisa S Biltueva, Jinhuan Wang, Tangliang Li, Wenhui Nie, Patricia C M O'Brien, Vitaly T Volobouev and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Karyotype diversity suggests that Laonastes aenigmamus (Laotian rock rat) (Rodentia, Diatomyidae) is a multi-specific genus.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2016
    Article
  6. Genome-wide comparative chromosome maps of Arvicola amphibius, Dicrostonyx torquatus, and Myodes rutilus.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Praomys tullbergi (Muridae, Rodentia) genome architecture decoded by comparative chromosome painting with Mus and Rattus.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2012
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Reconstruction of karyotype evolution in core Glires. I. The genome homology revealed by comparative chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2011
    Article
  16. Divergent patterns of breakpoint reuse in Muroid rodents.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2010
    Article
  17. New insights into the karyotypic evolution in muroid rodents revealed by multicolor banding applying murine probes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2010
    Article
  18. Chromosomal phylogeny of four Akodontini species (Rodentia, Cricetidae) from southern Brazil established by Zoo-FISH using Mus musculus (Muridae) painting probes.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2008
    Article
  19. Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). I. The genome homology of tundra vole, field vole, mouse and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Article
  20. Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). II. The genome homology of two mole voles (genus Ellobius), the field vole and golden hamster revealed by comparative chromosome painting.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Svetlana A RomanenkoInstitute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia.
Polina L Perelman
Natalya A Serdukova
Vladimir A Trifonov
Larisa S Biltueva
Jinhuan Wang
Tangliang Li
Wenhui Nie
Patricia C M O'Brien
Vitaly T Volobouev
Roscoe Stanyon
Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith
Fengtang Yang
Alexander S Graphodatsky
Institute of Cytology and Genetics · RUKunming Institute of Zoology · CNUniversity of Cambridge · GBChinese Academy of Sciences · CNInstitut de Systématique, Évolution, Biodiversité · FRUniversity of Florence · ITWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The laboratory mouse (Mus musculus, 2n = 40), the Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus, 2n = 22), and the golden (Syrian) hamster (Mesocricetus auratus, 2n = 44) are common laboratory animals, extensively used in biomedical research. In contrast with the mouse genome, which was sequenced and well characterized, the hamster species has been set aside. We constructed a chromosome paint set for the golden hamster, which for the first time allowed us to perform multidirectional chromosome painting between the golden hamster and the mouse and between the two species of hamster. From these data we constructed a detailed comparative chromosome map of the laboratory mouse and the two hamster species. The golden hamster painting probes revealed 25 autosomal segments in the Chinese hamster and 43 in the mouse. Using the Chinese hamster probes, 23 conserved segments were found in the golden hamster karyotype. The mouse probes revealed 42 conserved autosomal segments in the golden hamster karyotype. The two largest chromosomes of the Chinese hamster (1 and 2) are homologous to seven and five chromosomes of the golden hamster, respectively. The golden hamster karyotype can be transformed into the Chinese hamster karyotype by 15 fusions and 3 fissions. Previous reconstructions of the ancestral murid karyotype proposed diploid numbers from 2n = 52 to 2n = 54. By integrating the new multidirectional chromosome painting data presented here with previous comparative genomics data, we can propose that syntenies to mouse Chrs 6 and 16 were both present and to hypothesize a diploid number of 2n = 48 for the ancestral Murinae/Cricetinae karyotype.

Indexed as

Chromosome PaintingAnimalsCells, CulturedChromosomes, MammalianCricetinaeCricetulusDNA ProbesGenomeIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingMaleMesocricetusMicePhysical Chromosome MappingDNA Probes

Identifiers

PMID17143584
OpenAlexW2013801396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.