Evidence map›Paper›PMID 1714357›Full record

ArticleCurrent genetics1991

Splicing of the Petunia cytochrome oxidase subunit II intron.

K D Pruitt, M R Hanson

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current genetics, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K D PruittSection of Genetics and Development, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853.
M R Hanson
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A comparative analysis of the plant intron-containing mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit II (coxII) genes provides an indication that four conserved sequence motifs, present in exon 1 (intron-binding sequences; IBS), and complementary motifs (exon-binding sequences; EBS), present in domain I of the group II intron, may be involved in splicing of the intron. Two of these potential IBS motifs (IBS1 and IBS2) have been previously discussed. Two further potential IBS motifs (IBSa and IBSb), which occur twice within exon 1, could be involved in specification of the 5' splice site and of a 5' cryptic splice site. Nuclease-protection experiments and DNA sequence analysis of a spliced coxII cDNA have confirmed the predicted positions of the petunia coxII 5' and 3' splice sites. Evidence for the occurrence of splicing in vivo at the putative 5' cryptic splice site in petunia is provided by the detection of a nuclease-protected fragment corresponding to the size which is predicted if splicing at the proposed cryptic splice site occurs. The existence and location of a cryptic splice site, upstream of the normal coxII 5' splice site, is consistent with the proposed derivation of the cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS)-associated pcf gene from an abnormally spliced coxII transcript (Pruitt and Hanson 1989).

Indexed as

IntronsRNA SplicingBase SequenceCloning, MolecularElectron Transport Complex IVMacromolecular SubstancesMolecular Sequence DataNucleic Acid ConformationOligonucleotide ProbesPlantsRestriction MappingRNASequence Homology, Nucleic AcidSpecies SpecificityTranscription, GeneticElectron Transport Complex IVMacromolecular SubstancesOligonucleotide ProbesRNA

Identifiers

PMID1714357
OpenAlexW2019273825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.