Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17142256›Full record

Trial reportBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2007

Provision of taped conversations with neonatologists to mothers of babies in intensive care: randomised controlled trial.

Tieh Hee Hai Guan Koh, Phyllis N Butow, Michael Coory, Donna Budge, Li-An Collie, John Whitehall, Martin H Tattersall

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06998212 (The Effect of Smartphone-Based Recording Offer on Patient Satisfaction in Orthopedic Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06998212 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Smartphone-Based Recording Offer on Patient Satisfaction in Orthopedic Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorBlake HanRan2025 to 2026Enrolled972ConditionsPatient SatisfactionArmsOffer to record encounter
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Improving Staff Knowledge and Attitudes Toward Providing Psychosocial Support to NICU Parents Through an Online Education Course.Advances in neonatal care : official journal of the National Association of Neonatal Nurses · 2019
    Article
  6. Electronic communication preferences among mothers in the neonatal intensive care unit.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2016
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Negotiating decisions during informed consent for pediatric Phase I oncology trials.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2012
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Parents' views of involvement in concurrent research with their neonates.Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE · 2010
    Article
  14. Adolescent mothers in the NICU: how much do they understand?Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2010
    Article
  15. Patient education strategies in dermatology: part 2: methods.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2009
    Article
  16. Maternal and neonatal characteristics of extremely low birth weight infants who die in the first day of life.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2009
    Article
  17. Communicating with parents on the neonatal unit.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tieh Hee Hai Guan KohInstitute of Women's and Children's Health, Townsville Hospital, Douglas, QLD 4814, Australia. guan_koh@health.qld.gov.au
Phyllis N Butow
Michael Coory
Donna Budge
Li-An Collie
John Whitehall
Martin H Tattersall

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine whether providing mothers of babies in neonatal intensive care units with audiotapes of their conversations with a neonatologist improves recall of information and psychological wellbeing.

designRandomised, single blinded trial.

settingNeonatal intensive care unit, North Queensland, Australia.

participants200 mothers of babies in a neonatal intensive care unit.

interventionsMothers given (n=102) or not given (n=98) audiotapes of their conversations with a neonatologist.

main outcome measuresRecall of information, attitudes to and use of the tape, satisfaction with conversations, postnatal depression, anxiety, general health, and stress about parenting, at 10 days and four and 12 months.

results91% (n=93) of mothers in the tape group listened to the tape (once by day 10, twice by four months, and three times by 12 months; range 1-10). At 10 days and four months, mothers in the tape group recalled significantly more information about diagnosis, treatment, and outcome than mothers in the control group. At four months mothers in the tape group were 75% more likely to recall all of the information about treatment than mothers in the control group (59% v 34%; risk ratio 1.75, 95% confidence interval 1.27 to 2.4). Six mothers, all in the control group, could not recall their conversations. No statistically significant differences were found between the groups in satisfaction with conversations (10 days), postnatal depression and anxiety scores (10 days, four and 12 months), and stress about parenting (12 months).

conclusionProviding the mothers of babies in neonatal intensive care units with audiotapes of conversations with a neonatologist enhanced their recall of information (up to four months). The taped conversations did not affect the mothers' wellbeing or satisfaction with the neonatologist.

trial registrationAustralian Clinical Trials Registry 12606000478516.

Indexed as

Intensive Care, NeonatalNeonatologyPhysician-Patient RelationsAnxietyDepression, PostpartumFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMental RecallMothersPatient Education as TopicPatient SatisfactionQueenslandTape Recording

Identifiers

PMID17142256
PMCPMC1764090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.