Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17139324›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2006

Signature-tagged mutagenesis: barcoding mutants for genome-wide screens.

Piotr Mazurkiewicz, Christoph M Tang, Charles Boone, David W Holden

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Yeast for virus research.Microbial cell (Graz, Austria) · 2017
    Review
  12. Chemical genetics in drug discovery.Current opinion in systems biology · 2017
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. DNA Transposition at Work.Chemical reviews · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Piotr MazurkiewiczDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Centre for Molecular Microbiology and Infection, Imperial College London, Armstrong Road, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Christoph M Tang
Charles Boone
David W Holden

Funding

Medical Research Council G9717183Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA signature tags (molecular barcodes) facilitate functional screens by identifying mutants in mixed populations that have a reduced or increased adaptation to a particular environment. Many innovative adaptations and refinements in the technology have been described since its original use with Salmonella; they have yielded a wealth of information on a broad range of biological processes--mainly in bacteria, but also in yeast and other fungi, viruses, parasites and, most recently, in mammalian cells. By combining whole-genome microarrays and comprehensive ordered libraries of mutants, high-throughput functional screens can now be achieved on a genomic scale.

Indexed as

GenomeMutagenesis, InsertionalAnimalsBacteriaGene LibraryHumansMutationRNA InterferenceSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID17139324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.