Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17138698›Full record

ArticleThe Plant cell2006

Two cytosolic glutamine synthetase isoforms of maize are specifically involved in the control of grain production.

Antoine Martin, Judy Lee, Thomas Kichey, Denise Gerentes, Michel Zivy, Christophe Tatout, Frédéric Dubois, Thierry Balliau, Benoît Valot, Marlène Davanture and 14 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Plant cell, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 193 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
193citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
19.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

193 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 501 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Common genetic control for grain filling duration and kernel weight in grain sorghum.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Antoine MartinUnité de Nutrition Azotée des Plantes UR511, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, F-78026 Versailles Cedex, France.
Judy Lee
Thomas Kichey
Denise Gerentes
Michel Zivy
Christophe Tatout
Frédéric Dubois
Thierry Balliau
Benoît Valot
Marlène Davanture
Thérèse Tercé-Laforgue
Isabelle Quilleré
Marie Coque
André Gallais
María-Begoña Gonzalez-Moro
Linda Bethencourt
Dimah Z Habash
Peter J Lea
Alain Charcosset
Pascual Perez
Alain Murigneux
Hitoshi Sakakibara
Keith J Edwards
Bertrand Hirel
Département Santé des Plantes et Environnement · FRBiogemma (France) · FRUniversité de Picardie Jules Verne · FRUniversity of Bristol · GBLancaster University · GBRIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science · JPRothamsted Research · GBUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The roles of two cytosolic maize glutamine synthetase isoenzymes (GS1), products of the Gln1-3 and Gln1-4 genes, were investigated by examining the impact of knockout mutations on kernel yield. In the gln1-3 and gln1-4 single mutants and the gln1-3 gln1-4 double mutant, GS mRNA expression was impaired, resulting in reduced GS1 protein and activity. The gln1-4 phenotype displayed reduced kernel size and gln1-3 reduced kernel number, with both phenotypes displayed in gln1-3 gln1-4. However, at maturity, shoot biomass production was not modified in either the single mutants or double mutants, suggesting a specific impact on grain production in both mutants. Asn increased in the leaves of the mutants during grain filling, indicating that it probably accumulates to circumvent ammonium buildup resulting from lower GS1 activity. Phloem sap analysis revealed that unlike Gln, Asn is not efficiently transported to developing kernels, apparently causing reduced kernel production. When Gln1-3 was overexpressed constitutively in leaves, kernel number increased by 30%, providing further evidence that GS1-3 plays a major role in kernel yield. Cytoimmunochemistry and in situ hybridization revealed that GS1-3 is present in mesophyll cells, whereas GS1-4 is specifically localized in the bundle sheath cells. The two GS1 isoenzymes play nonredundant roles with respect to their tissue-specific localization.

Indexed as

Amino Acid SequenceBase SequenceCytosolEdible GrainGene Expression Regulation, EnzymologicGene Expression Regulation, PlantGenome, PlantGlutamate-Ammonia LigaseIsoenzymesMolecular Sequence DataMutagenesis, InsertionalMutationPhenotypePhloemPlant LeavesPlant RootsGlutamate-Ammonia LigaseIsoenzymesProtein SubunitsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID17138698
PMCPMC1693956
OpenAlexW2046941968

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.