Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17137790›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cancer biology2007

Spatial genome organization in the formation of chromosomal translocations.

Karen J Meaburn, Tom Misteli, Evi Soutoglou

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cancer biology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Interrogating the regulatory epigenome of cellular senescence.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. PeculiarGenes · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karen J MeaburnNational Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, United States. meaburnk@mail.nih.gov
Tom Misteli
Evi Soutoglou
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Nuclear Architecture and DiseaseZIABC010309 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MISTELI, THOMAS A · 2009 to 2025
$39.8M
Nuclear architecture and gene expression Z01BC010309 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MISTELI, THOMAS A · 1999 to 2008
$3.6M
NCI NIH HHS Z01 BC010309-07
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal translocations and genomic instability are universal hallmarks of tumor cells. While the molecular mechanisms leading to the formation of translocations are rapidly being elucidated, a cell biological understanding of how chromosomes undergo translocations in the context of the cell nucleus in vivo is largely lacking. The recent realization that genomes are non-randomly arranged within the nuclear space has profound consequences for mechanisms of chromosome translocations. We review here the emerging principles of spatial genome organization and discuss the implications of non-random spatial genome organization for the genesis and specificity of cancerous chromosomal translocations.

Indexed as

Translocation, GeneticCell NucleusGenomeGenome, HumanGenomic InstabilityHumansInterphaseModels, BiologicalModels, GeneticNeoplasmsSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Identifiers

PMID17137790
PMCPMC1805052
OpenAlexW2051584943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.