Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17137508›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2006

Genomewide identification of pheromone-targeted transcription in fission yeast.

Yongtao Xue-Franzén, Søren Kjaerulff, Christian Holmberg, Anthony Wright, Olaf Nielsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Meiotic cohesin Rec8 imposes fitness costs on fission yeast gametes favoring the evolution of parental bias in gene expression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Fission Yeast Mating-Type Switching Motto: "One-for-Two" and "Two-for-One".Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2023
    Review
  6. Pheromone Response and Mating Behavior in Fission Yeast.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2022
    Review
  7. Hastening Progress inMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microscopy of Fission Yeast Sexual Lifecycle.Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE · 2016
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. FYPO: the fission yeast phenotype ontology.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2013
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yongtao Xue-FranzénSchool of Life Sciences, Södertörns Högskola, SE-141 89 Huddinge, Sweden and Department of Bioscience and Nutrition, Karolinska Institutet, SE 141 57 Huddinge, Sweden. yongtao.xue@sh.se <yongtao.xue@sh.se>
Søren Kjaerulff
Christian Holmberg
Anthony Wright
Olaf Nielsen
University of Copenhagen · DKKarolinska Institutet · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFission yeast cells undergo sexual differentiation in response to nitrogen starvation. In this process haploid M and P cells first mate to form diploid zygotes, which then enter meiosis and sporulate. Prior to mating, M and P cells communicate with diffusible mating pheromones that activate a signal transduction pathway in the opposite cell type. The pheromone signalling orchestrates mating and is also required for entry into meiosis.

resultsHere we use DNA microarrays to identify genes that are induced by M-factor in P cells and by P-factor in M-cells. The use of a cyr1 genetic background allowed us to study pheromone signalling independently of nitrogen starvation. We identified a total of 163 genes that were consistently induced more than two-fold by pheromone stimulation. Gene disruption experiments demonstrated the involvement of newly discovered pheromone-induced genes in the differentiation process. We have mapped Gene Ontology (GO) categories specifically associated with pheromone induction. A direct comparison of the M- and P-factor induced expression pattern allowed us to identify cell-type specific transcripts, including three new M-specific genes and one new P-specific gene.

conclusionWe found that the pheromone response was very similar in M and P cells. Surprisingly, pheromone control extended to genes fulfilling their function well beyond the point of entry into meiosis, including numerous genes required for meiotic recombination. Our results suggest that the Ste11 transcription factor is responsible for the majority of pheromone-induced transcription. Finally, most cell-type specific genes now appear to be identified in fission yeast.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalGenes, FungalGenome, FungalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPheromonesReproducibility of ResultsReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionSchizosaccharomycesSchizosaccharomyces pombe ProteinsTranscription, GeneticPheromonesSchizosaccharomyces pombe Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17137508
PMCPMC1693924
OpenAlexW2109300271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.