ReviewDrugs2006
Targeted anti-cancer therapies for renal cancer.
Review in Drugs, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Inhibition of mTOR in kidney cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2009Article
- The importance of histology and cytogenetics in decision making for renal cell carcinoma.World journal of urology · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the past several years, significant advances in the underlying biological mechanisms of renal cell cancer, particularly the role of tumour angiogenesis, have permitted the design of molecularly targeted therapeutics. For this review, single-agent therapies inhibiting the following different targets were identified in the published literature: epithelial growth factor receptor, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, basic fibroblast growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor, nuclear factor-kappabeta, the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway, raf kinase pathway and tyrosine kinase pathway. Distinct fields of clinical research have emerged--monoclonal antibodies, small molecules, nanopeptides and immunomodulators. All therapies demonstrated acceptable toxicity profiles. Clinical benefit was assessed on the basis of the reported criteria for each study, and antitumour response (regression or delay in progression-free survival) ranged from 5% to 71%. On the basis of the limited studies to date, targeted therapies offer the greatest clinical benefit in the management of this malignancy, although additional basic research is still warranted to further improve clinical outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.