Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17136403›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2007

[Molecular imaging with new PET tracers].

A J Beer, M Schwaiger

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Radiolabelled RGD peptides for imaging and therapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2012
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A J BeerKlinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin, Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München. beer@roe.med.tum.de
M Schwaiger

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the recent years, positron emission tomography (PET) has gained more and more importance, especially in oncology for primary staging, as well as for response evaluation. The glucose analogon (18)F-FDG is the most widely used tracer up to now. In this paper, we review the applications of newly developed, more specific PET tracers. These tracers allow for imaging of a variety of biological processes, such as hypoxia and proliferation. The expression of different receptors can be visualized, like the somatostatin receptor 2 and the integrin alphavbeta3. Moreover, gene expression can be imaged as well. While most of these approaches are currently in the first phases of clinical evaluation, imaging of hypoxia and proliferation might be integrated into the daily routine in the near future.

Indexed as

RadiopharmaceuticalsImage EnhancementPositron-Emission TomographyPractice Patterns, Physicians'Radiopharmaceuticals

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.