Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17136344›Full record

ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2007

Water and salinity stress in grapevines: early and late changes in transcript and metabolite profiles.

Grant R Cramer, Ali Ergül, Jerome Grimplet, Richard L Tillett, Elizabeth A R Tattersall, Marlene C Bohlman, Delphine Vincent, Justin Sonderegger, Jason Evans, Craig Osborne and 4 more

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 170 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
170citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

170 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Label-Free Proteomics Reveals the Response of Oat (International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Effect ofAoB PLANTS · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Genome-Wide Identification and Characterisation ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article

110 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Grant R CramerDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, MS200, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, 89557-0014, USA. cramer@unr.edu
Ali Ergül
Jerome Grimplet
Richard L Tillett
Elizabeth A R Tattersall
Marlene C Bohlman
Delphine Vincent
Justin Sonderegger
Jason Evans
Craig Osborne
David Quilici
Karen A Schlauch
David A Schooley
John C Cushman

Funding

UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH AND TRAININGP20RR016464 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA RENO · PI REIBER, CARL · 2001 to 2011
$30.3M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR16464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Grapes are grown in semiarid environments, where drought and salinity are common problems. Microarray transcript profiling, quantitative reverse transcription-PCR, and metabolite profiling were used to define genes and metabolic pathways in Vitis vinifera cv. Cabernet Sauvignon with shared and divergent responses to a gradually applied and long-term (16 days) water-deficit stress and equivalent salinity stress. In this first-of-a-kind study, distinct differences between water deficit and salinity were revealed. Water deficit caused more rapid and greater inhibition of shoot growth than did salinity at equivalent stem water potentials. One of the earliest responses to water deficit was an increase in the transcript abundance of RuBisCo activase (day 4), but this increase occurred much later in salt-stressed plants (day 12). As water deficit progressed, a greater number of affected transcripts were involved in metabolism, transport, and the biogenesis of cellular components than did salinity. Salinity affected a higher percentage of transcripts involved in transcription, protein synthesis, and protein fate than did water deficit. Metabolite profiling revealed that there were higher concentrations of glucose, malate, and proline in water-deficit-treated plants as compared to salinized plants. The metabolite differences were linked to differences in transcript abundance of many genes involved in energy metabolism and nitrogen assimilation, particularly photosynthesis, gluconeogenesis, and photorespiration. Water-deficit-treated plants appear to have a higher demand than salinized plants to adjust osmotically, detoxify free radicals (reactive oxygen species), and cope with photoinhibition.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingDehydrationOsmotic PressureRNA, PlantTranscription, GeneticVitisRNA, Plant

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.