Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17136186›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of pharmaceutical education2006

Evaluation of evidence for interprofessional education.

Tami L Remington, Mariko A Foulk, Brent C Williams

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of pharmaceutical education, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Characterizing Research About Interprofessional Education Within Pharmacy.American journal of pharmaceutical education · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Student Evaluation of Interprofessional Experiences between Medical and Graduate Biomedical Students.Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Impact of interprofessional education on noninvasive ventilation in a tertiary neonatal intensive care unit.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tami L RemingtonCollege of Pharmacy, The University of Michigan, USA. remingtn@umich.edu
Mariko A Foulk
Brent C Williams

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on recommendations from numerous organizations, educators in healthcare disciplines are implementing interprofessional training programs. Our objective was to summarize relevant literature in a way that would be most useful to clinician educators. Studies involving educational interventions in health professions to enhance learner-based outcomes relevant to the provision of interprofessional care were identified. We sought prospective, controlled trials in which at least 2 health care disciplines were represented, and 1 of which was medicine. Thirteen reports met the criteria for inclusion. Interventions varied widely in design and intensity, but generally included both didactic and clinical components and lasted several weeks or longer. Most studies used pretest/posttest controls and observed positive effects on learners' attitudes and knowledge. Combined clinical and didactic experiences may produce short-term improvements in learners' knowledge and attitudes about interprofessional care. Future research should employ control groups and validated, behaviorally oriented outcome measures whenever possible.

Indexed as

Education, PharmacyInterprofessional RelationsProfessional-Patient RelationsControlled Clinical Trials as TopicDatabases, FactualHumansModels, EducationalPatient Selection

Identifiers

PMID17136186
PMCPMC1636959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.