Studies in occupational epidemiology and the risk of overadjustment.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Predictors of health related job loss: a two-year follow-up study in a general working population.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2007
   Trial
2. A prospective study on self-assessed mental well-being and work capacity as determinants of all-cause sickness absence.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2015
   Article
3. Are musculoskeletal complaints, related work impairment and desirable adjustments in work age-specific?International archives of occupational and environmental health · 2014
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  The prognostic value of depressive symptoms, fear-avoidance, and self-efficacy for duration of lost-time benefits in workers with musculoskeletal disorders.2006

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as