Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17135223›Full record

Trial reportHeart (British Cardiac Society)2007

Cost effectiveness of perindopril in reducing cardiovascular events in patients with stable coronary artery disease using data from the EUROPA study.

Andrew Briggs, Borislava Mihaylova, Mark Sculpher, Alistair Hall, Jane Wolstenholme, Maarten Simoons, Jaap Deckers, Roberto Ferrari, Willem J Remme, Michel Bertrand and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
16.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cost-effectiveness analysis of new generation coronary CT scanners for difficult-to-image patients.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Value for money and the Quality and Outcomes Framework in primary care in the UK NHS.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2010
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. ACE inhibitors: back to prime time?Heart (British Cardiac Society) · 2007
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew BriggsPublic Health and Health Policy, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK. a.briggs@clinmed.gla.ac.uk
Borislava Mihaylova
Mark Sculpher
Alistair Hall
Jane Wolstenholme
Maarten Simoons
Jaap Deckers
Roberto Ferrari
Willem J Remme
Michel Bertrand
Kim Fox
EUROPA Trial Investigators
Erasmus University Rotterdam · NLUniversity of Oxford · GBFondazione Salvatore Maugeri · ITLille’s Cardiology Hospital · FRPublic Health Scotland · GBRoyal Brompton Hospital · GBUniversity of Leeds · GBUniversity of York · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe EUropean trial on Reduction Of cardiac events with Perindopril in stable coronary Artery disease (EUROPA) trial has recently reported.

objectiveTo assess the cost effectiveness of perindopril in stable coronary heart disease in the UK.

methodsClinical and resource use data were taken from the EUROPA trial. Costs included drugs and hospitalisations. Health-related quality of life values were taken from published sources. A cost-effectiveness analysis is presented as a function of the risk of a primary event (non-fatal myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest or cardiovascular death) in order to identify people for whom treatment offers greatest value for money.

resultsThe median incremental cost of perindopril for each quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained across the heterogeneous population of EUROPA was estimated as 9700 pounds(interquartile range 6400-14,200 pounds). Overall, 88% of the EUROPA population had an estimated cost per QALY below 20,000 pounds and 97% below 30,000 pounds. For a threshold value of cost effectiveness of 30,000 pounds per QALY gained, treatment of people representing the 25th, 50th (median) and 75th centiles of the cost effectiveness distribution for perindopril has a probability of 0.999, 0.99 and 0.93 of being cost effective, respectively. Cost effectiveness was strongly related to higher risk of a primary event under standard care.

conclusionsWhether the use of perindopril can be considered cost effective depends on the threshold value of cost effectiveness of healthcare systems. For the large majority of patients included in EUROPA, the incremental cost per QALY gained was lower than the apparent threshold used by the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence in the UK.

Indexed as

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCardiovascular AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesCoronary DiseaseCost-Benefit AnalysisDrug CostsEuropeFemaleHealth Care CostsHospitalizationHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPerindoprilQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsCardiovascular AgentsPerindopril

Identifiers

PMID17135223
PMCPMC1955018
OpenAlexW2023856034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.