ReviewStem cell reviews2005
Stem cell plasticity: a rare cell, not a rare event.
Review in Stem cell reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Objective Optimized Fuzzy Clustering for Detecting Cell Clusters from Single-Cell Expression Profiles.Genes · 2019Article
- Discovery of rare cells from voluminous single cell expression data.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Revisiting tumor angiogenesis: vessel co-option, vessel remodeling, and cancer cell-derived vasculature formation.Chinese journal of cancer · 2016Review
- VEGF induces neuroglial differentiation in bone marrow-derived stem cells and promotes microglia conversion following mobilization with GM-CSF.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2012Article
- Cholinergic receptor pathways involved in apoptosis, cell proliferation and neuronal differentiation.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2009Article
- Derivation of neural stem cells from mesenchymal stemcells: evidence for a bipotential stem cell population.Stem cells and development · 2008Article
- Toward 'SMART' stem cells.Gene therapy · 2008Review
- Adult stem cell plasticity: introduction to the first issue of stem cell reviews.Stem cell reviews · 2005Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purification to homogeneity for a rare stem cell (SC) population by both function and phenotype is a prerequisite to determine if SCs can change their fate (plasticity). Since cell fate determination has been suggested by both external environmental cues and intrinsic gene regulation, plasticity should be studied using both influences. Different frequencies of marrow SC plasticity may be attributed to either different isolation technologies or different developmental stage SCs with more or less multipotentiality. Tissue-specific SCs may reside in marrow, or alternatively, primitive marrow SC may respond directly to regenerative signals by migration to injury sites and repairing the damaged tissue. It is important to dissect the relationship between primitive/tissue-specific SCs and regenerative signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17132874What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.