ReviewHeart failure reviews2006
Novel and potential future biomarkers for assessment of the severity and prognosis of chronic heart failure : a clinical review.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Combination Treatment With Antihypertensive Agents Enhances the Effect of Qiliqiangxin on Chronic Pressure Overload-induced Cardiac Hypertrophy and Remodeling in Male Mice.Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology · 2015Article
- Biomarkers: optimizing treatment guidance in heart failure.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2011Review
- Coronary sinus dilatation is associated with left ventricular systolic dysfunction and poor functional status in subjects with chronic heart failure.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2010Article
- Research needed to support clinical use of biomarkers as prognostic indicators for patients with heart failure.Cardiology research and practice · 2010Article
- A potential shift from adaptive immune activity to nonspecific inflammatory activation associated with higher depression symptoms in chronic heart failure patients.Journal of cardiac failure · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Over the last two decades, the pathophysiology and biomolecular basis of heart failure syndrome has reached sound and more comprehensive understanding. This knowledge has allowed expert researchers and clinicians to explore an entirely new spectrum of potential biochemical markers derived from different cellular and signaling pathways that lead to myocardial hypertrophy, chronic damage of the myocyte, apoptosis, and, ultimately, myocardial remodeling. Indeed, the link between myocardial remodeling and adverse outcomes, as well as the recognition of the myocardial interstitium as a multifunctional dynamic entity strongly influenced by systemic neurohormonal and inflammatory activation, has provided a solid ground for research of biomarkers that might correlate with severity and prognostication in chronic heart failure. This paper reviews and summarize recent literature on some of the most interesting circulating biomarkers with potential use for the stratification of patients with chronic heart failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17131079What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.