Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17131078›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2006

Nuclear imaging in cardiac cell therapy.

Frank M Bengel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Frank M BengelDivision of Nuclear Medicine, Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Johns Hopkins University Medical Institutions, 601 N Caroline St, JHOC 3225, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. fbengel1@jhmi.edu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac stem cell therapy is an innovative and promising therapeutic approach for heart failure. However, despite an increasing body of existing experimental and human data, it still presents a substantial challenge for basic scientists and clinical researchers. Several issues concerning biologic mechanisms of therapy remain to be answered, and unequivocal proof of clinical efficacy is needed. The variety of different available cell types and different methods for cell delivery to the myocardium raises further questions about the most useful therapeutic approach. Nuclear imaging not only provides accurate noninvasive information about myocardial perfusion, contractile function and viability, which enables assessment of clinical benefits of therapy. The rapidly developing field of molecular imaging has also brought up more specific tracers targeting cellular and subcellular biologic events, which are expected to shed more light upon mechanisms of cell therapy. Moreover, nuclear imaging is well suited for tracking of transplanted cells by use of direct radionuclide labeling or genetic labeling with reporter genes that can be targeted by radioactive reporter probes. Such a broad spectrum of available in vivo information is expected to significantly impact the future development of cell therapy towards a clinically accepted treatment.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingStem Cell TransplantationHeart FailureHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRadionuclide ImagingStem Cells

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.