ReviewHeart failure reviews2006
Nuclear imaging in cardiac cell therapy.
Review in Heart failure reviews, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radionuclide Imaging Applications in Cardiomyopathies and Heart Failure.Current cardiology reports · 2016Review
- Noninvasive cardiovascular imaging techniques for basic science research: application to cellular therapeutics.Revista espanola de cardiologia · 2009Review
- Present and future of clinical cardiovascular PET imaging in Europe--a position statement by the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC).European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2008Review
- Molecular imaging is indispensable for the development of stem cell-based myocardial regenerative therapy.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2007Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac stem cell therapy is an innovative and promising therapeutic approach for heart failure. However, despite an increasing body of existing experimental and human data, it still presents a substantial challenge for basic scientists and clinical researchers. Several issues concerning biologic mechanisms of therapy remain to be answered, and unequivocal proof of clinical efficacy is needed. The variety of different available cell types and different methods for cell delivery to the myocardium raises further questions about the most useful therapeutic approach. Nuclear imaging not only provides accurate noninvasive information about myocardial perfusion, contractile function and viability, which enables assessment of clinical benefits of therapy. The rapidly developing field of molecular imaging has also brought up more specific tracers targeting cellular and subcellular biologic events, which are expected to shed more light upon mechanisms of cell therapy. Moreover, nuclear imaging is well suited for tracking of transplanted cells by use of direct radionuclide labeling or genetic labeling with reporter genes that can be targeted by radioactive reporter probes. Such a broad spectrum of available in vivo information is expected to significantly impact the future development of cell therapy towards a clinically accepted treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
17131078What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.