Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17130624›Full record

ArticleTobacco control2006

"Stay away from them until you're old enough to make a decision": tobacco company testimony about youth smoking initiation.

Melanie Wakefield, Kim McLeod, Cheryl L Perry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco control, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. "Below the Line": The tobacco industry and youth smoking.The Australasian medical journal · 2011
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Pushing secondhand smoke and the tobacco industry outside the social norm to reduce adolescent smoking.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2008
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Melanie WakefieldCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, The Cancer Council Victoria, 100 Drummond Street, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia. melanie.wakefield@cancervic.org.au
Kim McLeod
Cheryl L Perry
Cancer Council Victoria · AUUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

ANALYSIS OF TOBACCO DEPOSITIONS AND TRIAL TESTIMONYR01CA087486 · NCI · MICHIGAN PUBLIC HEALTH INSTITUTE · PI DAVIS, RONALD M · 2000 to 2003
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS CA087486NCI NIH HHS R01 CA087486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine common themes used by US tobacco industry witnesses pertaining to youth smoking initiation during litigation in the United States.

methodsQualitative thematic analysis of transcripts from 29 tobacco litigation cases dating from 1992 to 2002.

resultsYouth smoking is portrayed by the tobacco industry as a source of great concern to them. Youth smoking prevention programmes developed by US tobacco companies are supposedly intended to delay decision-making about smoking until age 18, when individuals are then seen to be of an age where they are able to "choose to smoke". Tobacco industry media campaigns, youth access, community and school-based programmes are predicated on peer influence, parental factors, and commercial access being the primary influences on youth smoking uptake, rather than tobacco marketing, inaccurate risk appraisal, price and other factors known to influence youth smoking. Despite substantial financial investment in tobacco industry programmes, their witnesses were able to describe only weak evaluation methods, being preoccupied with measures of message comprehension, programme reach and uptake, and the associated costs of their efforts, rather than any evaluation designed to assess effects on youth smoking behaviour.

conclusionStated concerns about youth smoking and youth smoking prevention programmes are put forward in litigation as evidence that the tobacco industry is "serious" about tackling youth smoking, and serve as a primary strategy to improve the tobacco industry's public image. The tobacco industry's evaluation of the effectiveness of their youth smoking prevention programmes is demonstrably insufficient under current public health evaluation standards. Public health and welfare agencies should avoid engagement with tobacco industry-sponsored programmes.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorSmoking PreventionAdolescentDecision MakingHealth PromotionHumansMotivationSmokingSocial ResponsibilityTobacco IndustryUnited States

Identifiers

PMID17130624
PMCPMC2563589
OpenAlexW2053790748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.