ArticleTobacco control2006
"Stay away from them until you're old enough to make a decision": tobacco company testimony about youth smoking initiation.
Article in Tobacco control, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drawing on Adolescent Psychology to Achieve Tobacco-Free Generations.Public health reviews · 2022Article
- How does the British Soft Drink Association respond to media research reporting on the health consequences of sugary drinks?Globalization and health · 2021Article
- Policies that limit youth access and exposure to tobacco: a scientific neglect of the first stages of the policy process.BMC public health · 2019Article
- The Tobacco Industry and Children's Rights.Pediatrics · 2018Article
- Hiding in the Shadows: Philip Morris and the Use of Third Parties to Oppose Ingredient Disclosure Regulations.PloS one · 2015Article
- Tobacco or healthy children: the two cannot co-exist.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2013Review
- The tobacco-free generation proposal.Tobacco control · 2013Article
- Through tobacco industry eyes: civil society and the FCTC process from Philip Morris and British American Tobacco's perspectives.Tobacco control · 2012Article
- Classroom norms and individual smoking behavior in middle school.American journal of health behavior · 2012Article
- "Below the Line": The tobacco industry and youth smoking.The Australasian medical journal · 2011Article
- Forbidden fruit and the prediction of cigarette smoking.Substance use & misuse · 2010Article
- Pushing secondhand smoke and the tobacco industry outside the social norm to reduce adolescent smoking.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2008Article
- Working to make an image: an analysis of three Philip Morris corporate image media campaigns.Tobacco control · 2007Article
- Effect of televised, tobacco company-funded smoking prevention advertising on youth smoking-related beliefs, intentions, and behavior.American journal of public health · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine common themes used by US tobacco industry witnesses pertaining to youth smoking initiation during litigation in the United States.
methodsQualitative thematic analysis of transcripts from 29 tobacco litigation cases dating from 1992 to 2002.
resultsYouth smoking is portrayed by the tobacco industry as a source of great concern to them. Youth smoking prevention programmes developed by US tobacco companies are supposedly intended to delay decision-making about smoking until age 18, when individuals are then seen to be of an age where they are able to "choose to smoke". Tobacco industry media campaigns, youth access, community and school-based programmes are predicated on peer influence, parental factors, and commercial access being the primary influences on youth smoking uptake, rather than tobacco marketing, inaccurate risk appraisal, price and other factors known to influence youth smoking. Despite substantial financial investment in tobacco industry programmes, their witnesses were able to describe only weak evaluation methods, being preoccupied with measures of message comprehension, programme reach and uptake, and the associated costs of their efforts, rather than any evaluation designed to assess effects on youth smoking behaviour.
conclusionStated concerns about youth smoking and youth smoking prevention programmes are put forward in litigation as evidence that the tobacco industry is "serious" about tackling youth smoking, and serve as a primary strategy to improve the tobacco industry's public image. The tobacco industry's evaluation of the effectiveness of their youth smoking prevention programmes is demonstrably insufficient under current public health evaluation standards. Public health and welfare agencies should avoid engagement with tobacco industry-sponsored programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.