Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17130596›Full record

ArticleEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2006

Review of calls to NHS Direct related to attendance in the paediatric emergency department.

B Stewart, R Fairhurst, J Markland, O Marzouk

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Reducing inappropriate accident and emergency department attendances: a systematic review of primary care service interventions.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Pooled it
  3. Safety of telephone triage in out-of-hours care: a systematic review.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2011
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B StewartAccident and Emergency Department, Royal Liverpool Children's Hospital, Liverpool, UK. briar.stewart@rlc.nhs.uk
R Fairhurst
J Markland
O Marzouk
Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust · GBLondon North West Healthcare NHS Trust · GBRoyal Liverpool University Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the outcomes of calls to NHS Direct (NHS-D) in relation to attendance at the accident and emergency (A&E) department.

designA prospective collection of data about consecutive calls to NHS-D North West Coast was matched with attendances at the A&E department over a period of 3 months.

settingNHS-D Regional Trust and a large urban paediatric A&E department. PATIENTS: Children and young adults aged <16 years living in local postal code areas.

main outcome measuresTo examine (1) whether advice given by NHS-D was followed and (2) the differences in disease severity and necessity of attendance of patients referred by NHS-D and those referred by general practitioners and self-presenters.

resultsThe relationship between the advice given and subsequent action is complex. Only 70% of calls advised to attend the A&E department did so. A further 1% (176) were advised not to attend the A&E department did in fact attend the department. Patients referred by NHS-D represented only 3.2% of department attendances. There was little difference in the triage categories of the presenting groups, but there were significantly less admissions (p<0.01) in the NHS-D group.

conclusionsDelivering telephone advice about illness severity in children is difficult as visual clues are so important. More collaborative prospective studies are needed, including with primary care, to understand families' choices, and to refine and assess NHS-D's ability to discriminate those requiring further clinical assessment.

Indexed as

AdolescentAge FactorsChildChild, PreschoolEmergency Service, HospitalHealth Services ResearchHospitalizationHotlinesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornPatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient ComplianceProspective StudiesReferral and ConsultationState Medicine

Identifiers

PMID17130596
PMCPMC2564250
OpenAlexW2074755391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.