ArticleEmergency medicine journal : EMJ2006
Review of calls to NHS Direct related to attendance in the paediatric emergency department.
Article in Emergency medicine journal : EMJ, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Reducing inappropriate accident and emergency department attendances: a systematic review of primary care service interventions.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013Pooled it
- Safety of telephone triage in out-of-hours care: a systematic review.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2011Pooled it
- A Symptom-Checker for Adult Patients Visiting an Interdisciplinary Emergency Care Center and the Safety of Patient Self-Triage: Real-Life Prospective Evaluation.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Trial
- To what extent do callers follow the advice given by a non-emergency medical helpline (NHS 111): A retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2022Article
- Emergency Department Attendance after Telephone Triage: A Population-Based Data Linkage Study.Health services research · 2018Observational
- Compliance with telephone triage advice among adults aged 45 years and older: an Australian data linkage study.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Patient Safety Incidents Involving Sick Children in Primary Care in England and Wales: A Mixed Methods Analysis.PLoS medicine · 2017Article
- Young people's use of NHS Direct: a national study of symptoms and outcome of calls for children aged 0-15.BMJ open · 2013Article
- Asthma length of stay in hospitals in London 2001-2006: demographic, diagnostic and temporal factors.PloS one · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine the outcomes of calls to NHS Direct (NHS-D) in relation to attendance at the accident and emergency (A&E) department.
designA prospective collection of data about consecutive calls to NHS-D North West Coast was matched with attendances at the A&E department over a period of 3 months.
settingNHS-D Regional Trust and a large urban paediatric A&E department. PATIENTS: Children and young adults aged <16 years living in local postal code areas.
main outcome measuresTo examine (1) whether advice given by NHS-D was followed and (2) the differences in disease severity and necessity of attendance of patients referred by NHS-D and those referred by general practitioners and self-presenters.
resultsThe relationship between the advice given and subsequent action is complex. Only 70% of calls advised to attend the A&E department did so. A further 1% (176) were advised not to attend the A&E department did in fact attend the department. Patients referred by NHS-D represented only 3.2% of department attendances. There was little difference in the triage categories of the presenting groups, but there were significantly less admissions (p<0.01) in the NHS-D group.
conclusionsDelivering telephone advice about illness severity in children is difficult as visual clues are so important. More collaborative prospective studies are needed, including with primary care, to understand families' choices, and to refine and assess NHS-D's ability to discriminate those requiring further clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.