Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17130160›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2006

Amino acid residue doublet propensity in the protein-RNA interface and its application to RNA interface prediction.

Oanh T P Kim, Kei Yura, Nobuhiro Go

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 122 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Role of Optimization in RNA-Protein-Binding Prediction.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Computational tools to study RNA-protein complexes.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. DeepDISE: DNA Binding Site Prediction Using a Deep Learning Method.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Deciphering RNA-Recognition Patterns of Intrinsically Disordered Proteins.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Oanh T P KimQuantum Bioinformatics Team, Center for Computational Science and Engineering, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Kizu-cho, Souraku-gun, Kyoto 619-0215, Japan.
Kei Yura
Nobuhiro Go
Japan Atomic Energy Agency · JPNara Institute of Science and Technology · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-RNA interactions play essential roles in a number of regulatory mechanisms for gene expression such as RNA splicing, transport, translation and post-transcriptional control. As the number of available protein-RNA complex 3D structures has increased, it is now possible to statistically examine protein-RNA interactions based on 3D structures. We performed computational analyses of 86 representative protein-RNA complexes retrieved from the Protein Data Bank. Interface residue propensity, a measure of the relative importance of different amino acid residues in the RNA interface, was calculated for each amino acid residue type (residue singlet interface propensity). In addition to the residue singlet propensity, we introduce a new residue-based propensity, which gives a measure of residue pairing preferences in the RNA interface of a protein (residue doublet interface propensity). The residue doublet interface propensity contains much more information than the sum of two singlet propensities alone. The prediction of the RNA interface using the two types of propensities plus a position-specific multiple sequence profile can achieve a specificity of about 80%. The prediction method was then applied to the 3D structure of two mRNA export factors, TAP (Mex67) and UAP56 (Sub2). The prediction enables us to point out candidate RNA interfaces, part of which are consistent with previous experimental studies and may contribute to elucidation of atomic mechanisms of mRNA export.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsBinding SitesComputational BiologyDatabases, ProteinData Interpretation, StatisticalDEAD-box RNA HelicasesHumansModels, MolecularNucleocytoplasmic Transport ProteinsProtein BindingRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, MessengerAmino AcidsDDX39B protein, humanDEAD-box RNA HelicasesNucleocytoplasmic Transport ProteinsNXF1 protein, humanRNARNA-Binding ProteinsRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID17130160
PMCPMC1761430
OpenAlexW2007922755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.