Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17128701›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Medical Association2006

Demographic variations and clinical associations of episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in vaginal delivery.

Dotun Ogunyemi, Brandy Manigat, Jesse Marquis, Mohsen Bazargan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Medical Association, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perineal Lacerations: A Retrospective Study in a Habitual-Risk Public Maternity.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Third and fourth degree perineal injury after vaginal delivery: does race make a difference?Hawai'i journal of medicine & public health : a journal of Asia Pacific Medicine & Public Health · 2014
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dotun OgunyemiDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Charles R. Drew University of Medicine & Science/UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. ogunyemid@cshs.org
Brandy Manigat
Jesse Marquis
Mohsen Bazargan
Charles R. Drew University of Medicine and Science · US

Funding

PHS HHS G12 RRO3026-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledPrimiparity, birthweight, operative delivery and obstetrical complications contribute to episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations. Episiotomy correlates with Hispanics, while African Americans correlate with severe perineal lacerations.

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for both episiotomy and severe perineal lacerations in a large population from a single institution. STUDY

designThis was a review of 66,224 vaginal deliveries of African Americans or Hispanics delivering between 25-44 gestational weeks between 1981-2001. Univariate and multiple regression analysis were done as indicated.

resultsIndependent predictors of episiotomy were: primiparity eight-fold, forceps delivery seven-fold, vacuum delivery five-fold, shoulder dystocia 3.6-fold, macrosomia 1.8-fold, epidural analgesia 1.6-fold, postdates 1.5-fold, Hispanics 1.4-fold. Independent predictors of severe perineal lacerations were; macrosomia seven-fold, episiotomy 4.5-fold, primiparity 4.4-fold, shoulder dystocia 3.6-fold, average birthweight 3.5-fold, forceps delivery 2.6-fold, vacuum delivery two-fold, epidural analgesia two-fold, African-American 1.5-fold. Nonreassuring fetal heart rate patterns, meconium and cord accidents appeared protective.

conclusionPrimiparous women with larger babies undergoing operative delivery with epidural analgesia are at risk for both episiotomy incisions and severe perineal lacerations. Though Hispanics are more likely to have an episiotomy, they are at significantly less risk for severe perineal lacerations compared to African Americans. Even though episiotomy is independently associated with severe perineal laceration, other factors such as macrosomia and primiparity are as important.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnalgesia, EpiduralAnalgesia, ObstetricalBirth WeightBlack or African AmericanDelivery, ObstetricEpisiotomyFemaleHumansLacerationsLogistic ModelsPerineumPregnancyRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID17128701
PMCPMC2569796
OpenAlexW126066658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.