Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17123435›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2006

Comparative analysis of dinoflagellate chloroplast genomes reveals rRNA and tRNA genes.

Adrian C Barbrook, Nicole Santucci, Lindsey J Plenderleith, Roger G Hiller, Christopher J Howe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genomic perspectives on the birth and spread of plastids.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The apicomplexan plastid and its evolution.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2011
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. The origin of plastids.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2008
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Adrian C BarbrookDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, Downing Site, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge, CB2 1QW, UK. acb18@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
Nicole Santucci
Lindsey J Plenderleith
Roger G Hiller
Christopher J Howe

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeridinin-containing dinoflagellates have a highly reduced chloroplast genome, which is unlike that found in other chloroplast containing organisms. Genome reduction appears to be the result of extensive transfer of genes to the nuclear genome. Unusually the genes believed to be remaining in the chloroplast genome are found on small DNA 'minicircles'. In this study we present a comparison of sets of minicircle sequences from three dinoflagellate species.

resultsPCR was used to amplify several minicircles from Amphidinium carterae so that a homologous set of gene-containing minicircles was available for Amphidinium carterae and Amphidinium operculatum, two apparently closely related peridinin-containing dinoflagellates. We compared the sequences of these minicircles to determine the content and characteristics of their chloroplast genomes. We also made comparisons with minicircles which had been obtained from Heterocapsa triquetra, another peridinin-containing dinoflagellate. These in silico comparisons have revealed several genetic features which were not apparent in single species analyses. The features include further protein coding genes, unusual rRNA genes, which we show are transcribed, and the first examples of tRNA genes from peridinin-containing dinoflagellate chloroplast genomes.

conclusionComparative analysis of minicircle sequences has allowed us to identify previously unrecognised features of dinoflagellate chloroplast genomes, including additional protein and RNA genes. The chloroplast rRNA gene sequences are radically different from those in other organisms, and in many ways resemble the rRNA genes found in some highly reduced mitochondrial genomes. The retention of certain tRNA genes in the dinoflagellate chloroplast genome has important implications for models of chloroplast-mitochondrion interaction.

Indexed as

Genome, ProtozoanAnimalsBase SequenceChloroplastsDinoflagellidaMolecular Sequence DataPolymerase Chain ReactionRNA, ProtozoanRNA, RibosomalRNA, TransferSequence AlignmentRNA, ProtozoanRNA, RibosomalRNA, Transfer

Identifiers

PMID17123435
PMCPMC1679814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.