Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17122044›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2006

Stimulus frequency processing in awake rat barrel cortex.

Peter Melzer, Robert N S Sachdev, Ned Jenkinson, Ford F Ebner

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Correlated physiological and perceptual effects of noise in a tactile stimulus.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The head-fixed behaving rat--procedures and pitfalls.Somatosensory & motor research · 2010
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. High-frequency whisker vibration is encoded by phase-locked responses of neurons in the rat's barrel cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008
    Article
  15. Biomechanics of the vibrissa motor plant in rat: rhythmic whisking consists of triphasic neuromuscular activity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2008
    Article
  16. State changes rapidly modulate cortical neuronal responsiveness.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2007
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Peter MelzerDepartment of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA. peter.melzer@vanderbilt.edu
Robert N S Sachdev
Ned Jenkinson
Ford F Ebner

Funding

Shop Module CoreP30EY008126 · NEI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Kevin L Schey · 1989 to 2026
$19.6M
THREE-TIERED PREVENTION MODEL TO BETTER SERVE ALL STUDENP30HD015052 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 1985 to 2014
$18.6M
RECEPTIVE FIELDS OF LAYER IV--BARREL FIELD NEURONSR01NS025907 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI EBNER, FORD FRANCIS · 1988 to 2006
$2.1M
NEI NIH HHS EY-08126NEI NIH HHS P30 EY008126NICHD NIH HHS HD-15052NICHD NIH HHS P30 HD015052NINDS NIH HHS NS-25907NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS025907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In awake rats, we examined the relationship between neural spiking activity in primary somatic sensory cortex and the frequency of whisker stimulation. Neural responses were recorded extracellularly in barrel cortex while single whiskers were deflected with 0.5-18 air puffs per second (apps), a range that includes the whisk rates observed when rats explore their environment and discriminate surfaces with their whiskers. Twenty-nine neurons in layers III and IV were isolated in three rats (23 in barrel columns and 6 in septum columns). At < or = 9 apps, cortical neurons responded with one to two spikes per stimulus, whereas at > 9 apps, the response efficacy was reduced to only 0.2-0.4 spikes per stimulus. Several mechanisms are discussed that could account for the decrement in responsiveness. Despite this adaptation, neural spike rates increased in direct proportion with stimulus frequency when cast on logarithmic scales. At > 9 apps, however, this relationship deteriorated in barrel columns in which the response approximately halved. In contrast, septum column cells continued to increase their spike rates linearly up to 18 apps, although they responded at lower magnitude than the barrel column cells. Our findings suggest that septum column neurons are potential candidates to encode stimulus frequency using spike rate across the entire frequency range relevant to rats' whisking behavior.

Indexed as

Brain MappingWakefulnessAction PotentialsAnimalsCerebral CortexMaleNeuronsPhysical StimulationRatsRats, Long-EvansReaction TimeVibrissae

Identifiers

PMID17122044
PMCPMC6675424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.