ArticleImmunogenetics2007
A modular concept of HLA for comprehensive peptide binding prediction.
Article in Immunogenetics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soluble HLA technology as a strategy to evaluate the impact of HLA mismatches.Journal of immunology research · 2014Article
- Genetics of graft-versus-host disease: the major histocompatibility complex.Blood reviews · 2013Review
- Position 45 influences the peptide binding motif of HLA-B*44:08.Immunogenetics · 2012Article
- The nature of peptides presented by an HLA class I low expression allele.Haematologica · 2010Article
- Major histocompatibility complex class I binding predictions as a tool in epitope discovery.Immunology · 2010Review
- Major histocompatibility complex class II molecule-human immunodeficiency virus peptide analysis using a microarray chip.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2009Article
- Evaluation of MHC-II peptide binding prediction servers: applications for vaccine research.BMC bioinformatics · 2008Article
- Evaluation of MHC class I peptide binding prediction servers: applications for vaccine research.BMC immunology · 2008Article
- In silico characterization of immunogenic epitopes presented by HLA-Cw*0401.Immunome research · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A variety of algorithms have been successful in predicting human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-peptide binding for HLA variants for which plentiful experimental binding data exist. Although predicting binding for only the most common HLA variants may provide sufficient population coverage for vaccine design, successful prediction for as many HLA variants as possible is necessary to understand the immune response in transplantation and immunotherapy. However, the high cost of obtaining peptide binding data limits the acquisition of binding data. Therefore, a prediction algorithm, which applies the binding information from well-studied HLA variants to HLA variants, for which no peptide data exist, is necessary. To this end, a modular concept of class I HLA-peptide binding prediction was developed. Accurate predictions were made for several alleles without using experimental peptide binding data specific to those alleles. We include a comparison of module-based prediction and supertype-based prediction. The modular concept increased the number of predictable alleles from 15 to 75 of HLA-A and 12 to 36 of HLA-B proteins. Under the modular concept, binding data of certain HLA alleles can make prediction possible for numerous additional alleles. We report here a ranking of HLA alleles, which have been identified to be the most informative. Modular peptide binding prediction is freely available to researchers on the web at http://www.peptidecheck.org .
Indexed as
Identifiers
17119951What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.