Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17119945›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2007

Hepatic adverse drug reactions: a case/non-case study in Italy.

Domenico Motola, Antonio Vargiu, Roberto Leone, Alfredo Cocci, Francesco Salvo, Barbara Ros, Ilaria Meneghelli, Mauro Venegoni, Paola Maria Cutroneo, Alberto Vaccheri and 2 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Liver injury in the elderly due to fluoroquinolones: should these drugs be avoided?CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2012
    Article
  6. Atorvastatin-induced acute elevation of hepatic enzymes and the absence of cross-toxicity of pravastatin.International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2010
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Domenico MotolaDepartment of Pharmacology and Interuniversity Research Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 48, 40126 Bologna, Italy.
Antonio Vargiu
Roberto Leone
Alfredo Cocci
Francesco Salvo
Barbara Ros
Ilaria Meneghelli
Mauro Venegoni
Paola Maria Cutroneo
Alberto Vaccheri
Gianpaolo Velo
Nicola Montanaro

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAdverse drug reactions (ADRs) can involve all tissues and organs. Liver injuries are considered among the most serious and are a cause for concern among physicians and patients. To assess the extent of drug-induced liver injuries in Italy we compared the number of cases of hepatic ADRs with reports of all other drug-related reactions present in the same database.

methodsSpontaneous reports from six Italian Regions collected from January 1990 to May 2005 were analysed. Adverse reactions were classified according to WHO Adverse Reaction Terminology for causality assessment, and only those with "certain", "probable" or "possible" causality assessment were included. Association between drugs and hepatic ADRs was assessed using the case/non case method, calculating the ADR reporting odds ratio (ROR) as a measure of disproportionality.

resultsOn May 2005, the database contained 35,767 ADR reports, of which 11,829 were excluded because they were unclassifiable or unlikely in terms of causality assessment. Therefore, the analysis was carried out on 23,938 reports, of which 1,069 concerned hepatic ADRs (cases) and 22,869 concerned non-cases. The proportion of serious ADRs was about 40% in the overall database, and about 74% among cases. The drug classes with the highest number of cases were statins (ROR = 2.9, 95% CI 2.4-3.5), antiplatelet agents (ROR = 3.5; 95% CI 2.6-4.6), NSAIDs (ROR = 2.9; 95% CI 2.1-3.9) and macrolides (ROR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.2-2.3).

conclusionHepatic adverse drug reactions remain a serious concern for several drugs widely used in clinical practice. Monitoring hepatic enzymes on a monthly basis for the first 6 months of treatment has been suggested for patients taking medications known to be hepatotoxic. A better knowledge of the epidemiology and mechanisms of hepatic ADRs may contribute to minimising their occurrence.

Indexed as

Chemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDatabases, FactualDrug MonitoringHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIatrogenic DiseaseItalyMacrolidesPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMacrolidesPlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.