Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17119891›Full record

ReviewDer Nervenarzt2006

[Endovascular treatment for intracranial stenoses. A common statement by neurologists and neuroradiologists].

J Berkefeld, G F Hamann, R du Mesnil, W Kurre, H Steinmetz, F E Zanella, M Sitzer

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00816166 (Phase III Study of Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System Compared to Best Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Ischemic Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00816166 phase2 / phase3terminatednot on this mapstarted 2008, after this paper: background citation

Phase III Study of Pharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System Compared to Best Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Ischemic Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorCodman & ShurtleffRan2008 to 2014Enrolled125ConditionsIschemic Stroke, Transient Ischemic AttackArmsPharos Vitesse Neurovascular Stent System (Stent implantation) + Medical therapy (Aspirin and Clopidogrel), Aspirin and Clopidogrel (Medical therapy)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J BerkefeldInstitut für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum der Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Berkefeld@em.uni-frankfurt.de
G F Hamann
R du Mesnil
W Kurre
H Steinmetz
F E Zanella
M Sitzer
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEHelios Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial stenoses cause 5-10% of all strokes and are increasingly detected by means of modern imaging methods. The stroke danger of high-grade symptomatic stenoses is relatively high, with an annual risk of approximately 10% under medical treatment. Coumadin increases the risk of hemorrhage, and after risk/benefit considerations, antiplatelets should be preferred for antithrombotic therapy. Despite optimized medical treatment, a small group of patients with recurrent symptoms or symptomatic stenoses without adequate collateral supply probably carry higher spontaneous stroke risk and may be considered for intracranial stenting, which itself is associated with procedural risks of up to 10%. Currently published case series show relatively high complication rates as a major drawback of endovascular treatment, mainly strokes after occlusion of perforating branches extending from the stenotic vessel segment or hemorrhagic complications. According to data from smaller feasibility studies, stroke rates in follow-up after successful stenting seem to be low. The average rate of high-grade restenosis with possible indication for reintervention is 10%. Improvements in endovascular treatment aim at reducing vessel wall trauma during balloon angioplasty by underdilatation or the use of self-expanding stents. Until complication rates are dependably reduced to values of 5-6%, indication for endovascular treatment should be restricted to patients without therapeutic alternatives. According to limited data with large variation between different studies, a prospective multicentric registry is proposed for systematic evaluation and further development of the method.

Indexed as

Angioplasty, BalloonStentsAlgorithmsCerebral AngiographyCerebral InfarctionFollow-Up StudiesHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedIntracranial ArteriosclerosisIntracranial EmbolismMagnetic Resonance ImagingPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsRecurrenceRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomePlatelet Aggregation Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID17119891
OpenAlexW3126452005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.