Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17118977›Full record

ArticleInfection and immunity2007

Differential activation of human gingival epithelial cells and monocytes by Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbriae.

Mehmet A Eskan, George Hajishengallis, Denis F Kinane

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and immunity, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Alzheimer's Disease andLife (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  4. Frankincense (Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Phylogenomic analysis of theFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Complement Is Required for Microbe-Driven Induction of Th17 and Periodontitis.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2022
    Article
  10. The Japanese dental science review · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Current oral health reports · 2020
    Article
  15. Roles of Porphyromonas gingivalis and its virulence factors in periodontitis.Advances in protein chemistry and structural biology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Infection and immunity · 2019
    Article
  18. Pathogenesis of Important Virulence Factors ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mehmet A EskanUniversity of Louisville School of Dentistry, 501 South Preston Street, Room 204, Louisville, KY 40292, USA.
George Hajishengallis
Denis F Kinane
University of Louisville · US

Funding

P. gingivalis as a keystone pathogenR01DE015254 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HAJISHENGALLIS, GEORGIOS · 2004 to 2018
$4.6M
NIDCR NIH HHS DE015254NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE015254PHS HHS HF01199-01PHS HHS HRSAC76PHS HHS PA04189
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans develop periodontitis in response to challenge by microbial dental plaque. Inflammation begins after perturbation of gingival epithelial cells by subgingival bacteria interacting through pattern-recognition receptors, including the Toll-like receptors (TLR). Porphyromonas gingivalis is a major periodontopathogen that interacts with epithelial cells through its cell surface fimbriae (FimA), leading to colonization and/or invasion. Previous work by our group has established membrane CD14 as an essential coreceptor for TLR2-mediated activation of transfected cell lines by P. gingivalis FimA. We have shown that gingival epithelial cells express TLR2 but not CD14 on their cell surfaces. We thus speculated that P. gingivalis FimA does not readily activate epithelial innate immune responses but rather functions to promote P. gingivalis colonization in the absence of a vigorous FimA-induced response. This hypothesis was verified by the findings that primary human gingival epithelial cells responded poorly to FimA in terms of interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and tumor necrosis factor alpha responses, in stark contrast to the marked response to other TLR2 agonists (Pam3Cys, FSL-1) that are not strictly dependent on CD14. On the other hand, CD14-expressing human primary monocytes responded with high levels of the same cytokines to both FimA and the control TLR2 agonists. The gingival epithelial cells failed to respond to FimA even in the presence of exogenously added soluble CD14. These data indicate that the gingival epithelial cell hyporesponsiveness to FimA is attributable to the lack of membrane-expressed but not soluble CD14. In conclusion, P. gingivalis FimA differentially activates human monocytes and epithelial cells, perhaps reflecting different tactics used by P. gingivalis when interacting with different host cell types or a host strategy to limit inflammation.

Indexed as

Cells, CulturedDiglyceridesEpithelial CellsFimbriae, BacterialGingivaGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansImmunologic FactorsInterleukin-6Interleukin-8Lipopolysaccharide ReceptorsMonocytesOligopeptidesPorphyromonas gingivalisToll-Like Receptor 2Tumor Necrosis Factor-alphaDiglyceridesFSL-1 lipoprotein, syntheticGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorImmunologic FactorsInterleukin-6Interleukin-8Lipopolysaccharide ReceptorsOligopeptidesTLR2 protein, humanToll-Like Receptor 2Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha

Identifiers

PMID17118977
PMCPMC1828485
OpenAlexW1973874869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.