Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17118764›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of hematology2006

Posttransplantation engraftment and safety of cord blood transplantation with grafts containing relatively low cell doses in adults.

Satoshi Takahashi, Jun Ooi, Akira Tomonari, Takaaki Konuma, Nobuhiro Tsukada, Arinobu Tojo, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, Shigetaka Asano

Abstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of hematology, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Satoshi TakahashiDivision of Molecular Therapy, Advanced Clinical Research Center, School of Health Sciences and Nursing, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. radius@ims.u-tokyo.ac.jp
Jun Ooi
Akira Tomonari
Takaaki Konuma
Nobuhiro Tsukada
Arinobu Tojo
Takuhiro Yamaguchi
Shigetaka Asano
The University of Tokyo · JPTokyo University of Science · JPUniversity of Tokyo Health Sciences · JPWaseda University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cell dose of a graft is a critical determinant of hematopoietic recovery and survival following unrelated cord blood transplantation. Most studies have found that the minimum acceptable nucleated cell dose should be between 1.5 X 10(7) and 2.0 X 10(7) nucleated cells per kilogram of body weight to reduce the time to myeloid recovery and increase the probability of engraftment. For some patients who have indications for hematopoietic cell transplants and for whom no other graft source except cord blood is available, it is difficult to decide whether they can receive cord blood grafts containing lower cell doses. In our study, patients who received cord blood grafts containing 1.0 X 10(7) to 2.0 X 10(7) cells/kg (n = 7) exhibited slower neutrophil and platelet recoveries compared with patients who received grafts containing total nucleated cell doses of 2.0 X 10(7) cells/kg and above (n = 93); however, 4 of those low-cell-dose recipients survived with a longer follow-up. Based on these preliminary results, cord blood grafts containing less than 2.0 X 10(7) cells/kg may be useful for cases where no grafts with higher cell doses or other stem cell sources are available.

Indexed as

Graft SurvivalAdolescentAdultBlood Cell CountCord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationHematopoiesisHumansMiddle AgedNeutrophilsPlatelet CountSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID17118764
OpenAlexW2088036576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.