Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17118157›Full record

ReviewBMC neuroscience2006

Rules of engagement promote polarity in RNA trafficking.

John H Carson, Nicholas Blondin, George Korza

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC neuroscience, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Molecular basis for the action of a dietary flavonoid revealed by the comprehensive identification of apigenin human targets.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John H CarsonDepartment of Molecular Microbial and Structural Biology, Center for Cell Analysis, and Modelling, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT 06030, USA. jcarson@nso2.uchc.edu
Nicholas Blondin
George Korza
UConn Health · US

Funding

VIRTUAL FCSP41RR013186 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LOEW, LESLIE M · 1998 to 2011
$14.2M
RNA Trafficking in Neural Cells.R01NS015190 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CARSON, JOHN H · 1985 to 2009
$2.4M
RNA trafficking in neural cellsR56NS015190 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI CARSON, JOHN H · 2007 to 2007
$364k
CENTER FOR CELLULAR NANO-ORGANIZATION (RMI)PN1EY016530 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT SCH OF MED/DNT · PI LOEW, LESLIE M · 2004 to 2004
$66k
NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR013186NCRR NIH HHS RR13186NEI NIH HHS EY16530NEI NIH HHS PN1 EY016530NINDS NIH HHS NS15190NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS015190NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS015190
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many cell biological pathways exhibit overall polarity (net movement of molecules in one direction) even though individual molecular interactions in the pathway are freely reversible. The A2 RNA trafficking pathway exhibits polarity in moving specific RNA molecules from the nucleus to localization sites in the myelin compartment of oligodendrocytes or dendritic spines in neurons. The A2 pathway is mediated by a ubiquitously expressed trans-acting trafficking factor (hnRNP A2) that interacts with a specific 11 nucleotide cis-acting trafficking sequence termed the A2 response element (A2RE) found in several localized RNAs. Five different molecular partners for hnRNP A2 have been identified in the A2 pathway: hnRNP A2 itself, transportin, A2RE RNA, TOG (tumor overexpressed gene) and hnRNP E1, each playing a key role in one particular step of the A2 pathway. Sequential interactions of hnRNP A2 with different molecular partners at each step mediate directed movement of trafficking intermediates along the pathway. Specific "rules of engagement" (both and, either or, only if) govern sequential interactions of hnRNP A2 with each of its molecular partners. Rules of engagement are defined experimentally using three component binding assays to measure differential binding of hnRNP A2 to one partner in the presence of each of the other partners in the pathway. Here we describe rules of engagement for hnRNP A2 binding to each of its molecular partners and discuss how these rules of engagement promote polarity in the A2 RNA trafficking pathway. For molecules with multiple binding partners, specific rules of engagement govern different molecular interactions. Rules of engagement are ultimately determined by structural relationships between binding sites on individual molecules. In the A2 RNA trafficking pathway rules of engagement governing interactions of hnRNP A2 with different binding partners provide the basis for polarity of movement of intermediates along the pathway.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesBiological TransportCell NucleusCell PolarityHeterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Group A-BKaryopherinsProtein BindingRNAHeterogeneous-Nuclear Ribonucleoprotein Group A-BhnRNP A2KaryopherinsRNA

Identifiers

PMID17118157
PMCPMC1775043
OpenAlexW1970526850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.