Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17116451›Full record

ReviewThe Surgical clinics of North America2006

Management of peritonitis in the critically ill patient.

Carlos A Ordoñez, Juan Carlos Puyana

Abstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The Surgical clinics of North America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. A rare case of perforation of a colorectal tumor by a fish bone.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carlos A OrdoñezUniversidad del Valle, Fundación Clínica Valle del Lili, Autopista Simón Bolívar, Carrera 98 No. 18-49, Cali, Colombia.
Juan Carlos Puyana

Funding

Trauma and Injury Excellence in Education on Research (TralnEER) ProgramD43TW007560 · FIC · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI PUYANA, JUAN CARLOS · 2006 to 2010
$745k
FIC NIH HHS 1D43 TW 007560-01FIC NIH HHS D43 TW007560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Severe secondary peritonitis carries significant mortality, despite advancements in critical care support and other therapies. Surgical management requires a multidisciplinary approach to guide the timing and the number of interventions necessary to eradicate the septic foci and create optimal healing with the fewest complications. Research is needed regarding the best surgical strategy for very severe cases. The use of deferred primary anastomosis seems safe in patients presenting with hemodynamic instability and hypoperfusion. These patients have a high risk of anastomotic failure and fistula formation. Allowing for aggressive resuscitation and judicious assessment of the progression of local inflammation are safe strategies to achieve the highest success and minimize serious and protracted complications in patients who survive the initial septic insult.

Indexed as

Abdominal WallAnastomosis, SurgicalCritical IllnessHumansLaparotomyPeritoneumPeritonitisReoperationResuscitationTherapeutic Irrigation

Identifiers

PMID17116451
PMCPMC3413265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.