Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17116126›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2007

Clinical risk management of herb-drug interactions.

Peter A G M De Smet

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Pharmacokinetic interactions of herbs with cytochrome p450 and p-glycoprotein.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2015
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Updates on the clinical evidenced herb-warfarin interactions.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Effects of Flos carthami on CYP2D6 and on the Pharmacokinetics of Metoprolol in Rats.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2011
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Peter A G M De SmetScientific Institute of Dutch Pharmacists, The Hague and Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. pdesmet@winap.nl

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The concomitant use of conventional and herbal medicines can lead to clinically relevant herb-drug interactions. Clinical risk management offers a systematic approach to minimize the untoward consequences of these interactions by paying attention to: (i) risk identification and assessment; (ii) development and execution of risk reduction strategies; and (iii) evaluation of risk reduction strategies. This paper reviews which steps should be explored or taken in these domains to improve the clinical risk management of adverse herb-drug interactions.

Indexed as

Herb-Drug InteractionsHumansPhytotherapyPlant PreparationsRisk FactorsPlant Preparations

Identifiers

PMID17116126
PMCPMC2000738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.