Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17111279›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2007

Routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for choledocholithiasis in octogenarians: is it worth the risk?

R Costi, D DiMauro, A Mazzeo, A S Boselli, S Contini, V Violi, L Roncoroni, L Sarli

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07001423 (ChOlecystectomy aFter successFul Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Extraction in Elderly), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07001423 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

ChOlecystectomy aFter successFul Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stone Extraction in Elderly

TypeinterventionalSponsorHelsinki University Central HospitalRan2025 to 2032Enrolled400ConditionsCholecystectomy, Laparoscopic, Choledocholithiasis, CholelithiasisArmsLaparoscopic cholecystectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Prophylactic cholecystectomy offers best outcomes following ERCP clearance of common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Outcome of acute pancreatitis in octogenarians: A retrospective study.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

R CostiDipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche, Università degli Studi di Parma, Via Gramsci 14, 43100, Parma, Italy. renatocosti@hotmail.com
D DiMauro
A Mazzeo
A S Boselli
S Contini
V Violi
L Roncoroni
L Sarli
University of Parma · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo unanimous consensus has been reached as to the need for routine laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) after endoscopic sphincterotomy (ES) for choledocholithiasis in very elderly patients, who are considered as high-risk subjects for surgery.

methodsFrom 1991 through 1997, 170 patients were referred to undergo preoperative ES and routine LC for common bile duct (CBD) stones. The results for 27 patients (age 80 years or older) were compared with those achieved for younger patients. Successively, in a retrospective case-control study, the results for the selected patients were compared with those for 27 very elderly patients who underwent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), but did not receive LC. The mean follow-up period was 126 months.

resultsOctogenarians showed longer surgery time (79 vs 51 min) and postoperative hospital stay (2.8 vs 1.2 days), as well as more early low-grade complications (15% vs 3%), whereas there were no differences in conversion rate or serious complications. Recurrent symptoms or complications developed in 48% of octogenarians not undergoing routine LC, and 30% finally needed surgery. One patient in the control group died after emergency cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. The results of surgery were significantly poorer for the control group.

conclusionsAlthough a "wait-and-see" policy allowed two-thirds of LCs to be avoided in octogenarians, biliary-related events developed for every second patient, often requiring delayed surgery, with poorer results. Sequential treatment (ES followed by elective LC) is a safe procedure for octogenarians, and should be considered as a standard, definitive treatment for cholecystocholedocholithiasis even after the age of 80 years.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicSphincterotomy, EndoscopicAgedAged, 80 and overCase-Control StudiesCause of DeathCholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic RetrogradeCholedocholithiasisEmergency Medical ServicesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedRecurrence

Identifiers

PMID17111279
OpenAlexW2146026765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.