Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17111240›Full record

ArticlePharmacy world & science : PWS2006

Development of a software tool for computation of parenteral nutrition in adults, and its potential role in improving nutritional care.

Marina Paschidi, Maria Skouroliakou, Fotis Archontovassilis, Petros Papassarantopoulos, Sophia L Markantonis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy world & science : PWS, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Nutrition Informatics Applications in Clinical Practice: a Systematic Review.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2015
    Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marina PaschidiLaboratory of Biopharmaceutics and Pharmacokinetics, School of Pharmacy, University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, and Surgical Intensive Care Unit, First Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, Hippokratio General Hospital, Athens, GR157.71, Greece.
Maria Skouroliakou
Fotis Archontovassilis
Petros Papassarantopoulos
Sophia L Markantonis

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detailed development of a computer program for management of parenteral nutrition (PN) in adults is described. Strengths and weaknesses are mentioned. By using the software, individualized PN prescriptions based on patient age, weight, sex, and clinical condition can be determined and available formulations can be automatically selected from incorporated databases. Automated PN management potentially enhances our ability to provide nutritional support with greater accuracy and precision and reduces the time required for writing and calculations. Day-to-day changes may also be monitored rapidly, simply, and safely.

Indexed as

SoftwareAdultHumansNutritional SupportParenteral NutritionProteinsProteins

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.