Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17110445›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Engineering cottonseed for use in human nutrition by tissue-specific reduction of toxic gossypol.

Ganesan Sunilkumar, LeAnne M Campbell, Lorraine Puckhaber, Robert D Stipanovic, Keerti S Rathore

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 130 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
130citing papers in PubMed
23.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

130 citing papers in PubMed, 474 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Content characteristics and genetic architecture of macronutrient signatures in cottonseed.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

70 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ganesan SunilkumarInstitute for Plant Genomics and Biotechnology and Department of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
LeAnne M Campbell
Lorraine Puckhaber
Robert D Stipanovic
Keerti S Rathore
Centre for Plant Biotechnology and Genomics · ESSouthern Plains Agricultural Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Global cottonseed production can potentially provide the protein requirements for half a billion people per year; however, it is woefully underutilized because of the presence of toxic gossypol within seed glands. Therefore, elimination of gossypol from cottonseed has been a long-standing goal of geneticists. Attempts were made to meet this objective by developing so-called "glandless cotton" in the 1950s by conventional breeding techniques; however, the glandless varieties were commercially unviable because of the increased susceptibility of the plant to insect pests due to the systemic absence of glands that contain gossypol and other protective terpenoids. Thus, the promise of cottonseed in contributing to the food requirements of the burgeoning world population remained unfulfilled. We have successfully used RNAi to disrupt gossypol biosynthesis in cottonseed tissue by interfering with the expression of the delta-cadinene synthase gene during seed development. We demonstrate that it is possible to significantly reduce cottonseed-gossypol levels in a stable and heritable manner. Results from enzyme activity and molecular analyses on developing transgenic embryos were consistent with the observed phenotype in the mature seeds. Most relevant, the levels of gossypol and related terpenoids in the foliage and floral parts were not diminished, and thus their potential function in plant defense against insects and diseases remained untouched. These results illustrate that a targeted genetic modification, applied to an underutilized agricultural byproduct, provides a mechanism to open up a new source of nutrition for hundreds of millions of people.

Indexed as

DietFood SupplyFlowersGenetic EngineeringGenetic VectorsGossypiumGossypolHumansIsomerasesPlant LeavesPlant RootsPlants, Genetically ModifiedRNA InterferenceSeedsTerpenesTranscription, Geneticdelta-cadinene synthaseGossypolIsomerasesTerpenes

Identifiers

PMID17110445
PMCPMC1838705
OpenAlexW2028922415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.