Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17110442›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2006

Ribosomal tethering and clustering as mechanisms for translation initiation.

Stephen A Chappell, Gerald M Edelman, Vincent P Mauro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genome research · 2017
    Article
  9. A researcher's guide to the galaxy of IRESs.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Translation initiation mediated by RNA looping.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stephen A ChappellDepartment of Neurobiology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Gerald M Edelman
Vincent P Mauro

Funding

Internal Initiation in the Translation of Cellular mRNAsR01GM061725 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI MAURO, VINCENT P · 2001 to 2004
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM61725NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM061725
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eukaryotic mRNAs often recruit ribosomal subunits some distance upstream of the initiation codon; however, the mechanisms by which they reach the initiation codon remain to be fully elucidated. Although scanning is a widely accepted model, evidence for alternative mechanisms has accumulated. We previously suggested that this process may involve tethering of ribosomal complexes to the mRNA, in which the intervening mRNA is bypassed, or clustering, in which the initiation codon is reached by dynamic binding and release of ribosomal subunits at internal sites. The present studies tested the feasibility of these ideas by using model mRNAs and revealed that translation efficiency varied with the distance between the site of ribosomal recruitment and the initiation codon. The present studies also showed that translation could initiate efficiently at AUG codons located upstream of an internal site. These observations are consistent with ribosomal tethering at the cap structure and clustering at internal sites.

Indexed as

Peptide Chain Initiation, TranslationalCodon, InitiatorMultigene FamilyRibosomesRNA CapsCodon, InitiatorRNA Caps

Identifiers

PMID17110442
PMCPMC1838709

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.