Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17109780›Full record

ReviewParasitology2007

Biology of the schistosome lung-stage schistosomulum.

G N Gobert, M Chai, D P McManus

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Parasitology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Nitric oxide in parasitic infections: a friend or foe?Journal of parasitic diseases : official organ of the Indian Society for Parasitology · 2022
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Immune Evasion Strategies of Schistosomes.Frontiers in immunology · 2020
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Schistosome infection and its effect on pulmonary circulation.Global cardiology science & practice · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

G N GobertMolecular Parasitology Laboratory, Infectious Diseases and Immunology Division, The Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Brisbane, Queensland 4006 Australia. geoffG@qimr.edu.au
M Chai
D P McManus

Funding

Wellcome Trust 071657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Past and more recent research has examined the ultrastructure, metabolism, cell biology, genomics and post-genomics of schistosome schistosomula. These areas are considered and discussed in this review with particular emphasis on (1) the early migration phases through the host, (2) interaction of the host immune response with the parasite surface, (3) glucose uptake mechanisms, and (4) defining the transcriptional profiles of lung-stage schistosomula compared with other developmental stages using microarrays. The microarray profiling studies suggest caution is required when considering the use of schistosomes obtained by in vitro means for molecular or biochemical studies.

Indexed as

AnimalsGene Expression RegulationHelminth ProteinsLungSchistosomaHelminth Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17109780
PMCPMC2754249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.