Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17109565›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2006

Prescribing antiepileptics for the elderly: differences between guideline recommendations and clinical practice.

Mary Jo V Pugh, Perry J Foreman, Dan R Berlowitz

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00144001 (Appropriateness of Antiepileptic Drug Use for Older Veterans), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00144001 completednot on this map

Appropriateness of Antiepileptic Drug Use for Older Veterans

TypeobservationalSponsorUS Department of Veterans AffairsRan2000 to 2008Enrolled9,682ConditionsEpilepsy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary Jo V PughSouth Texas Veterans Healthcare System, San Antonio, Texas, USA. pughm@uthscsa.edu
Perry J Foreman
Dan R Berlowitz
Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial Veterans Hospital · USMichael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center · USSouth Texas Veterans Health Care System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of epilepsy in patients aged >60 years is higher than in any other period of life. Yet, until recently, what was known about the treatment of older patients with epilepsy has been inferred from studies in younger patients. A growing body of clinical evidence focused exclusively on the elderly suggests that, while some issues are similar for older and younger adults, older patients with epilepsy may require even more attention regarding antiepileptic drug (AED) selection than younger patients. This article reviews published guidelines and recommendations to identify explicit recommendations for use of specific AEDs in the elderly, and assesses the extent to which those recommendations have been adopted in clinical practice. We found that while one systematically derived guideline stated that lamotrigine may be a good choice for older patients because of its favourable adverse effect profile, only clinical recommendations based on expert opinion explicitly identified AEDs that are more and less appropriate for use in the elderly. Examination of published studies describing recent AED-prescribing patterns suggests that clinical recommendations have been, at best, slowly adopted. This observation is exemplified by the fact that older patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy are still prescribed phenobarbital--a drug identified as suboptimal in 1985. In order to better understand the delay in adopting clinical recommendations, we examine these findings in light of diffusion of innovations theory, a theory that has been used to understand dissemination of other new medical technologies. According to this theory, while it is too early to suggest that use of second-generation AEDs in the elderly has been delayed, the continued use of phenobarbital in older patients newly diagnosed with epilepsy represents a serious delay in adoption of recent guidelines. Delays may be related to lack of knowledge by primary care clinicians and emergency room physicians (who frequently treat older patients with epilepsy), lack of 'opinion leaders' in primary care and perhaps general neurology, clinicians' focus on seizure control as the primary endpoint in treating patients with epilepsy, and difficulties in changing long-standing prescribing patterns. Research targeting barriers to more appropriate prescribing is needed to determine appropriate strategies for changing AED prescribing practices in the elderly.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedAnticonvulsantsDiffusion of InnovationEpilepsyHumansResearchAnticonvulsants

Identifiers

PMID17109565
OpenAlexW1037854419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.