ArticleNucleic acids research2007
DDBJ working on evaluation and classification of bacterial genes in INSDC.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Key interactions in integrin ectodomain responsible for global conformational change detected by elastic network normal-mode analysis.Biophysical journal · 2008Article
- Correlation between amino acid residues converted by RNA editing and functional residues in protein three-dimensional structures in plant organelles.BMC plant biology · 2008Article
- Discrimination of class I cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer photolyase from blue light photoreceptors by single methionine residue.Biophysical journal · 2008Article
- DDBJ with new system and face.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- GenBank.Nucleic acids research · 2008Article
- Public databases and software for the pathway analysis of cancer genomes.Cancer informatics · 2007Article
- Gene organization in rice revealed by full-length cDNA mapping and gene expression analysis through microarray.PloS one · 2007Article
- Restauro-G: a rapid genome re-annotation system for comparative genomics.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ) (http://www.ddbj.nig.ac.jp) newly collected and released 12,927,184 entries or 13,787,688,598 bases in the period from July 2005 to June 2006. The released data contain honeybee expressed sequence tags (ESTs), re-examined and re-annotated complete genome data of Escherichia coli K-12 W3110, medaka WGS and human MGA. We also systematically evaluated and classified the genes in the complete bacterial genomes submitted to the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC, http://insdc.org) that is composed of DDBJ, EMBL Bank and GenBank. The examination and classification selected 557,000 genes as reliable ones among all the bacterial genes predicted by us.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.