ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2006
Influence of socioeconomic status on clinical outcomes and quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- The Effect of Socioeconomic Factors on Outcomes of Distal Radius Fractures: A Systematic Review.Hand (New York, N.Y.) · 2018Pooled it
- Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Preference-Based Quality of Life Values in Coronary Heart Disease.PloS one · 2016Pooled it
- Ivabradine treatment in a chronic heart failure patient cohort: symptom reduction and improvement in quality of life in clinical practice.Advances in therapy · 2014Trial
- Effects of socioeconomic status on functional status and health-related quality of life in hip fracture patients.Archives of osteoporosis · 2026Article
- Exploring the impact of the Index of Multiple Deprivation on percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes: Insights from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society database.Global cardiology science & practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward postoperative self-management among patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: A structural equation modeling analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
- Article
- Impact of Patient Unawareness and Socioeconomic Factors on Patient Presentation to Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia · 2022Article
- Socioeconomic Factors and their Impact on Access and Use of Coronary and Structural Interventions.European cardiology · 2022Review
- Socioeconomic Status and Prognosis of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Managed by the Emergency-Intervention "Codi IAM" Network.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- The role of the socio-economic environment on medical outcomes after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Future cost-effectiveness and equity of the NHS Health Check cardiovascular disease prevention programme: Microsimulation modelling using data from Liverpool, UK.PLoS medicine · 2018Article
- Impact of socioeconomic status on adverse cardiac events after coronary angioplasty: a cohort study.Heart Asia · 2018Article
- Article
- Socioeconomic status, cognitive-emotional factors, and health status following myocardial infarction: testing the Reserve Capacity Model.Journal of behavioral medicine · 2015Article
- Health-related quality of life and socioeconomic status: inequalities among adults with a chronic disease.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2014Article
- Self-reported health following percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a cohort followed for 3 years with multiple measurements.Clinical epidemiology · 2014Article
- Article
- Patient-centered outcomes after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine whether socioeconomic status (SES) influences clinical outcomes and quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
designProspective observational study.
settingTwo interventional cardiac centres.
participants1346 consecutive patients undergoing PCI over a 12-month period. OUTCOMES: Self reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D); EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)), repeat angiography, revascularisation, hospital admission, myocardial infarction and death within 12 months, by SES derived using postal address code. MAIN
resultsNo significant differences were found between patients with high and low SES in the occurrence of repeat angiography (p = 0.55), repeat revascularisation (PCI, p = 0.81, CAEG, p = 0.27), total cardiac hospitalisation (p = 0.10), myocardial infarction (p = 0.97) or death 12 months after PCI (p = 0.88). Non-procedure-related readmissions were higher in patients with low SES (18.6% v 13.7%; p = 0.025). After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with low SES had lower HRQoL scores at baseline (95% CI for difference 0.01 to 0.14; p = 0.003) and at 12 months (95% CI 0.07 to 0.17; p<0.001) compared with those with high SES.
conclusionsClinical outcomes were similar for patients in different SES groups. Patients with low SES had considerably more non-procedure-related readmissions and lower quality-of-life scores. Future studies on HRQoL after coronary revascularisation should take account of these important differences related to SES.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.