Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17108063›Full record

Trial reportNeuro-oncology2007

The relationship between six-month progression-free survival and 12-month overall survival end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

Karla V Ballman, Jan C Buckner, Paul D Brown, Caterina Giannini, Patrick J Flynn, Betsy R LaPlant, Kurt A Jaeckle

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuro-oncology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 175 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
175citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
13.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

175 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 314 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Guideline
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Phase II Investigation of TVB-2640 (Denifanstat) with Bevacizumab in Patients with First Relapse High-Grade Astrocytoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2023
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Circulating Immune Cell and Outcome Analysis from the Phase II Study of PD-L1 Blockade with Durvalumab for Newly Diagnosed and Recurrent Glioblastoma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2022
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Oncolytic H-1 Parvovirus Shows Safety and Signs of Immunogenic Activity in a First Phase I/IIa Glioblastoma Trial.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2017
    Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

115 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Karla V BallmanDivision of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. ballman@mayo.edu
Jan C Buckner
Paul D Brown
Caterina Giannini
Patrick J Flynn
Betsy R LaPlant
Kurt A Jaeckle
Mayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMetro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium · USMayo Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Common end points for phase II trials in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) are six-month progression-free survival (PFS6) and 12-month overall survival (OS12). OS12 can be accurately measured but may be confounded with subsequent therapies upon progression, whereas the converse is true for PFS6. Our goal was to assess the relationship between these end points separately for phase II trials in patients with newly diagnosed GBM and patients with recurrent GBM. Data were pooled from 11 North Central Cancer Treatment Group trials for patients with newly diagnosed GBM (n = 1348). All patients received radiotherapy and pharmaceutical therapy (before, during, or after radiotherapy). Data were pooled from 16 trials that used various pharmaceuticals in treating patients for recurrent GBM (n = 345). All trial regimens were declared nonefficacious by predefined criteria. Overall per-patient concordance was estimated with a kappa statistic. The relationship between OS12 and PFS6 across study arms was assessed by weighted linear regression and Pearson's correlation. Simulation was used to determine the agreement of study outcomes when using PFS6 versus OS12 end points. Cox models with progression status as a time-dependent variable and Kaplan-Meier estimators were used to ascertain the association between progression-free survival status and overall survival. At present, 97% of the patients with newly diagnosed GBM and 95% of those with recurrent GBM have died. The PFS6 and OS12 were 43% and 41%, respectively, for patients with newly diagnosed disease and 9% and 14% for patients with recurrent disease. There was only moderate concordance between the end points on both the patient level and the study level. For the simulation studies, we established phase II efficacy criteria for each end point by using the pooled estimates of OS12 (PFS6) as historical controls. The study decisions made using PFS6 and OS12 were in agreement 88% and 90% of the time for the trials of newly diagnosed and recurrent disease, respectively. Finally, there was a strong association between progression-free survival status and overall survival. PFS6 seems to be a reasonable end point for phase II trials in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSurvival RateTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID17108063
PMCPMC1828103
OpenAlexW2137832651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.