Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17108030›Full record

ArticleJournal of virology2007

A severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus that lacks the E gene is attenuated in vitro and in vivo.

Marta L DeDiego, Enrique Alvarez, Fernando Almazán, María Teresa Rejas, Elaine Lamirande, Anjeanette Roberts, Wun-Ju Shieh, Sherif R Zaki, Kanta Subbarao, Luis Enjuanes

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of virology, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 268 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
268citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

268 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 446 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. SARS-CoV-2-derived RNA replicons as safe and effective vaccines.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

208 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Marta L DeDiegoDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología, CSIC, Darwin 3, Campus Universidad Autónoma, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain.
Enrique Alvarez
Fernando Almazán
María Teresa Rejas
Elaine Lamirande
Anjeanette Roberts
Wun-Ju Shieh
Sherif R Zaki
Kanta Subbarao
Luis Enjuanes
Centro Nacional de Biotecnología · ESNational Center for Infectious Diseases · USNational Institutes of Health · USNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases · USUniversidad Autónoma de Madrid · ES

Funding

Vaccines, Immunoprophylaxis, and Immunotherapy for SARSZ01AI000934 · NIAID · NIAID EXTRAMURAL ACTIVITIES · PI SUBBARAO, KANTA · 2003 to 2008
$1.9M
Vaccines, Immunoprophylaxis, and Immunotherapy for SARSZIAAI000934 · NIAID · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ALLERGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASES · PI SUBBARAO, KANTA · 2009 to 2012
$1.5M
Intramural NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A deletion mutant of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) has been engineered by deleting the structural E gene in an infectious cDNA clone that was constructed as a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC). The recombinant virus lacking the E gene (rSARS-CoV-DeltaE) was rescued in Vero E6 cells. The recovered deletion mutant grew in Vero E6, Huh-7, and CaCo-2 cells to titers 20-, 200-, and 200-fold lower than the recombinant wild-type virus, respectively, indicating that although the E protein has an effect on growth, it is not essential for virus replication. No differences in virion stability under a wide range of pH and temperature were detected between the deletion mutant and recombinant wild-type viruses. Although both viruses showed the same morphology by electron microscopy, the process of morphogenesis seemed to be less efficient with the defective virus than with the recombinant wild-type one. The rSARS-CoV-DeltaE virus replicated to titers 100- to 1,000-fold lower than the recombinant wild-type virus in the upper and lower respiratory tract of hamsters, and the lower viral load was accompanied by less inflammation in the lungs of hamsters infected with rSARS-CoV-DeltaE virus than with the recombinant wild-type virus. Therefore, the SARS-CoV that lacks the E gene is attenuated in hamsters, might be a safer research tool, and may be a good candidate for the development of a live attenuated SARS-CoV vaccine.

Indexed as

AnimalsCaco-2 CellsChlorocebus aethiopsCricetinaeGene DeletionHumansRespiratory SystemSevere Acute Respiratory SyndromeSevere acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirusVero CellsViral Structural ProteinsVirus ReplicationViral Structural Proteins

Identifiers

PMID17108030
PMCPMC1797558
OpenAlexW2148955224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.