Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17106633›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2006

If we build it ... will they come?--establishing a cancer genetics services clinic for an underserved predominantly Latina cohort.

Charité Ricker, Veronica Lagos, Nancy Feldman, Susan Hiyama, Sue Fuentes, Visanth Kumar, Kelly Gonzalez, Melanie Palomares, Kathleen Blazer, Katrina Lowstuter and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03511690 (Testing an Intelligent Tutoring System Intervention to Enhance Genetic Risk Assessment in Underserved Blacks and Latinas at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03511690 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Testing an Intelligent Tutoring System Intervention to Enhance Genetic Risk Assessment in Underserved Blacks and Latinas at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorGeorgetown UniversityRan2017 to 2022Enrolled95ConditionsHereditary Breast and Ovarian CancerArmsBRCA-Gist
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Systematic evidence review and meta-analysis of outcomes associated with cancer genetic counseling.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Charité RickerCity of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clinical Cancer Genetics, Duarte, CA, USA.
Veronica Lagos
Nancy Feldman
Susan Hiyama
Sue Fuentes
Visanth Kumar
Kelly Gonzalez
Melanie Palomares
Kathleen Blazer
Katrina Lowstuter
Deborah MacDonald
Jeffrey Weitzel

Funding

ZOPOLRESTAT IN NORMOTENSIVE, TYPE 1 DIA WITH INCIPIENT NEPHROPATHYM01RR000043 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI ZAIA, JOHN A · 1985 to 2010
$76.4M
NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR000043NCRR NIH HHS M01 RR00043
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer genetic counseling and testing is a standard of care option for appropriate families and can identify individuals at increased risk prior to diagnosis, when prevention or detection strategies are most effective. Despite documented efficacy of cancer risk reduction in high-risk individuals, underserved and minority individuals have a disproportionate cancer burden and limited access to genetic counseling.

methodsA needs assessment survey documented gaps in knowledge and interest in prevention. Satellite clinics were established at two indigent healthcare systems. Cancer genetics CME lectures were conducted and referral guidelines disseminated to clinicians who referred patients for counseling.

resultsAn increase in clinician knowledge was demonstrated post-CME and reflected by quality referrals. Eighty-eight percent of patients kept their appointments. In the predominantly Latina(6) (n=77) clinic population, 71.4% were affected with cancer, and 17 mutation positive families were identified. Preliminary data shows a positive impact on patients' motivation and behavior. The majority has expressed satisfaction and reduction in anxiety.

conclusionsThis study demonstrates feasibility and acceptability of cancer genetics services in this population, suggesting the potential to reduce cancer morbidity in underserved, high-risk families.

Indexed as

Medically Underserved AreaAdultCohort StudiesCommunity-Institutional RelationsDemographyFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHealth Services Needs and DemandHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleNeoplasmsPatient Education as TopicPreventive Health ServicesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.