Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17106223›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary science2006

Pharmacokinetics, urinary excretion and dosage regimen of levofloxacin following a single intramuscular administration in cross bred calves.

Vinod K Dumka, Anil K Srivastava

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary science, 2006. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vinod K DumkaDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, College of Veterinary Science, Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Science University, Ludhiana-141004, India. vkdumka@yahoo.com
Anil K Srivastava
Guru Angad Dev Veterinary and Animal Sciences University · INUniversity of Kashmir · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion following single intramuscular administration of levofloxacin at a dose of 4 mg/kg was investigated in seven male cross bred calves. Appreciable plasma concentration of levofloxacin (0.38+/-0.06 microgram/ml) was detected at 1 min after injection and the peak plasma level of 3.07+/-0.08 microgram/ml was observed at 1 h. The drug level above MIC90 in plasma was detected up to 12 h after administration. Rapid absorption of the drug was also evident by the high value of the absorption rate constant (2.14+/-0.24 /h). The overall systemic bioavailability of levofloxacin, after intramuscular administration, was 56.6+/-12.4%. The high value of AUC (7.66+/-0.72 mg.h/ml) reflected the vast area of body covered by drug concentration. Extensive distribution of the drug into various body fluids and tissues was noted by the high value of Vd(area) (1.02+/-0.05 l/kg). The high ratio of AUC/MIC (76.6+/-7.25) obtained in this study indicated excellent clinical and bacteriological efficacy of levofloxacin in calves. The elimination half-life and MRT were 3.67+/-0.4 h and 5.57+/-0.51 h, respectively. The total body clearance (Cl(B)) was 204.9+/-22.6 ml/kg/h. On the basis of the pharmacokinetic parameters, a suitable intramuscular dosage regimen for levofloxacin in calves would be 1.5 mg/kg repeated at 12 h intervals.

Indexed as

LevofloxacinAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsArea Under CurveBiological AvailabilityCattleHalf-LifeInjections, IntramuscularMaleOfloxacinAnti-Bacterial AgentsLevofloxacinOfloxacin

Identifiers

PMID17106223
PMCPMC3242140
OpenAlexW2130334061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.