Evidence map›Paper›PMID 17103196›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2007

Quality of life of Danish colorectal cancer patients with and without a stoma.

Lone Ross, Annemette G Abild-Nielsen, Birthe L Thomsen, Randi V Karlsen, Ellen H Boesen, Christoffer Johansen

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 147 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Health State Utility Values for Ileostomies and Colostomies: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Synthesis and summary of patient-reported outcome measures to inform the development of a core outcome set in colorectal cancer surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2015
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Guideline
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, and mortality among colorectal patients: 5-year follow-up.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The brain-gut axis in gastrointestinal cancers.Journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2021
    Review
  16. Current practice in Australia and New Zealand for defunctioning ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery with anastomosis: Analysis of the Binational Colorectal Cancer Audit.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Quality of life in postostomy surgery patients: A cross-sectional survey.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2020
    Article
  19. Understanding the Public's Emotions about Cancer: Analysis of Social Media Data.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lone RossInstitute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, 49 Strandboulevarden, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. ross@cancer.dk
Annemette G Abild-Nielsen
Birthe L Thomsen
Randi V Karlsen
Ellen H Boesen
Christoffer Johansen
Danish Cancer Society · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

goals of the workAs part of a psychosocial intervention study, we wanted to prospectively assess the quality of life of colorectal cancer patients who were given a stoma at the time of their initial operation for cancer or later and those whose initial stoma was removed. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 249 colorectal cancer patients were recruited and responded to a questionnaire 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after the initial operation (26-35% had a stoma during follow-up). MAIN

resultsAlthough most of the differences between stoma and non-stoma patients failed to reach significance, 22 out of 27 variables indicated a poorer quality of life for those with a stoma. Patients who currently had a stoma had significantly higher levels of depression (p = 0.013), poorer social functioning (p = 0.0085) and more problems with body image (p = 0.0001), future perspectives (p = 0.0058), micturition (p = 0.018) and side effects from chemotherapy (p = 0.008), but fewer problems with constipation (p = 0.034) than non-stoma patients. Male patients with a stoma had more sexual problems than males without a stoma (p = 0.015). Among those with a current stoma, quality of life seemed poorer among those whose stoma was made during follow-up compared with those with an initial stoma.

conclusionsTrends suggested that having a stoma led to poorer scores in most aspects of quality of life and that having a stoma made some time after the initial operation was more distressing than having a stoma made during the primary cancer operation.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsSurgical StomasAgedDenmarkFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID17103196
OpenAlexW2051596543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.